leonard mlumba shango vs nalaila lazaro kiula 2009 tzhc 211 13 november 2009

leonard mlumba shango vs nalaila lazaro kiula 2009 tzhc 211 13 november 2009

The applicant failed to show sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in filing his objection; he was fully represented and informed of the outcome, and his claims of lack of representation, conflict of interest, and breach of confidentiality were unsubstantiated.

Citation
leonard mlumba shango vs nalaila lazaro kiula 2009 tzhc 211 13 november 2009
Parties
Applicant: Leonard Mlumba Shango; Respondent: Nalaila Lazaro Kiula
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 November 2009
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Taxation of Costs, Professional Conduct of Advocates, Conflict of Interest
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Taxation of Costs Professional Conduct of Advocates Conflict of Interest

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Mlumba Shango

Applicant

Nalaila Lazaro Kiula

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for delay in filing objection to the ex-parte decision of the Taxing Master
  2. 2 Whether there was a conflict of interest by the applicant's former advocates
  3. 3 Whether there was a breach of confidentiality by the applicant's former advocate

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to show sufficient cause for the inordinate delay in filing his objection; he was fully represented and informed of the outcome, and his claims of lack of representation, conflict of interest, and breach of confidentiality were unsubstantiated.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed.
  • Applicant to pay costs to the respondent.