LEONARD SATU MASHABARA Vs

LEONARD SATU MASHABARA Vs

The TLS public statement does not bind its members in their professional conduct or create a conflict of interest that would disqualify them from representing the accused; the right to legal representation is constitutional and cannot be ousted by such a statement; no illegality, impropriety, or irregularity was disclosed to warrant revision or disqualification.

Citation
LEONARD SATU MASHABARA Vs
Parties
Applicant: Leonard Satu Mashabara; 1st Respondent: Republic; 2nd Respondent: MT 140105 Clinton Damas @ Nyundo; 3rd Respondent: Praygod Mushi; 4th Respondent: Amin Lord Lema; 5th Respondent: Nickson Jackson
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision and Disqualification of Advocates
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Conflict of Interest, Right to Legal Representation, Professional Conduct of Advocates
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Legal Profession Conflict of Interest Right to Legal Representation Professional Conduct of Advocates

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Satu Mashabara

Applicant

Republic

1st Respondent

MT 140105 Clinton Damas @ Nyundo

2nd Respondent

Praygod Mushi

3rd Respondent

Amin Lord Lema

4th Respondent

Nickson Jackson

5th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision and Disqualification of Advocates

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the public statement by Tanganyika Law Society (TLS) creates a conflict of interest for its members representing accused persons in a criminal case
  2. 2 Whether TLS members should be disqualified from representing the 2nd to 5th respondents due to the TLS public statement
  3. 3 Whether the right to legal representation is affected by the TLS statement

Ratio Decidendi

The TLS public statement does not bind its members in their professional conduct or create a conflict of interest that would disqualify them from representing the accused; the right to legal representation is constitutional and cannot be ousted by such a statement; no illegality, impropriety, or irregularity was disclosed to warrant revision or disqualification.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed in its entirety
  • No order as to costs