leonila ludovick rauya vs mm pardhan another 2008 tzhc 267 19 february 2008
The suit is time barred as it was filed more than 3 years after the cause of action arose. Time spent negotiating with the insurer is not excluded under the Law of Limitation Act. The court has no discretion to entertain a time-barred suit and cannot invoke inherent powers where substantive law applies.
- Citation
- leonila ludovick rauya vs mm pardhan another 2008 tzhc 267 19 february 2008
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Leonila Ludovick Rauya; 1st Defendant: M. M. Pardhan; 2nd Defendant: Idd Ally
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Suit dismissed as time barred
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Vicarious Liability, Personal Injury, Inherent Powers of Court
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leonila Ludovick Rauya
Plaintiff
M. M. Pardhan
1st Defendant
Idd Ally
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is time barred under the Law of Limitation Act
- 2 Whether time spent negotiating with insurer can be excluded from limitation period
- 3 Whether the court can invoke inherent powers to entertain a time-barred suit
Ratio Decidendi
The suit is time barred as it was filed more than 3 years after the cause of action arose. Time spent negotiating with the insurer is not excluded under the Law of Limitation Act. The court has no discretion to entertain a time-barred suit and cannot invoke inherent powers where substantive law applies.
Court Disposition
Suit dismissed as time barred
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment