leonila ludovick rauya vs mm pardhan another 2008 tzhc 267 19 february 2008

leonila ludovick rauya vs mm pardhan another 2008 tzhc 267 19 february 2008

The suit is time barred as it was filed more than 3 years after the cause of action arose. Time spent negotiating with the insurer is not excluded under the Law of Limitation Act. The court has no discretion to entertain a time-barred suit and cannot invoke inherent powers where substantive law applies.

Citation
leonila ludovick rauya vs mm pardhan another 2008 tzhc 267 19 february 2008
Parties
Plaintiff: Leonila Ludovick Rauya; 1st Defendant: M. M. Pardhan; 2nd Defendant: Idd Ally
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
19 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Suit dismissed as time barred
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Vicarious Liability, Personal Injury, Inherent Powers of Court
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonila Ludovick Rauya

Plaintiff

M. M. Pardhan

1st Defendant

Idd Ally

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the suit is time barred under the Law of Limitation Act
  2. 2 Whether time spent negotiating with insurer can be excluded from limitation period
  3. 3 Whether the court can invoke inherent powers to entertain a time-barred suit

Ratio Decidendi

The suit is time barred as it was filed more than 3 years after the cause of action arose. Time spent negotiating with the insurer is not excluded under the Law of Limitation Act. The court has no discretion to entertain a time-barred suit and cannot invoke inherent powers where substantive law applies.

Court Disposition

Suit dismissed as time barred