Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

in the matter of the estate of the late obed laizer vs in the matter of an application for letters of administration by suzan obed laizer 2023 tzhc 19428 31 july 2023.

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The petitioner, as widow and prior administratrix, is entitled to letters of administration for the unadministered properties discovered after closure of the previous probate cause.

Court disposition

Petition granted

Orders

  • Petitioner granted letters of administration for the unadministered estate

02

Material facts

Parties

Suzan Obed Laizer

Petitioner

Obed Boaz Laizer

Deceased

Amounts and remedies

  • Number of Unadministered Bank Accounts: 4
  • Number of Unadministered Properties (excluding Bank Accounts): 2

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Probate & Administration Cause / Ruling on Petition for Letters of Administration for Unadministered Estate

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the petitioner should be granted letters of administration for the unadministered estate of the deceased

Party arguments

Applicant
Petitioner, as widow and previous administratrix, seeks fresh letters of administration for properties discovered after closure of the prior probate cause.
Respondent
No respondent appeared or contested; no arguments presented.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Naftary Petro vs. Marry Protas (2019) T.L.R 561

    Priority in grant of probate or letters of administration is given to those interested in the estate, especially heirs.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The petitioner, as widow and prior administratrix, is entitled to letters of administration for the unadministered properties discovered after closure of the previous probate cause.

Court disposition

Petition granted

  • Petitioner granted letters of administration for the unadministered estate

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 31 July 2023

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 31 July 2023

in the matter of the estate of the late obed laizer vs in the matter of an application for letters of administration by suzan obed laizer 2023 tzhc 19428 31 july 2023.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

IN THE DISTRICT REGISTRY OF ARUSHA

AT ARUSHA PROBATE & ADMINISTRATION CAUSE NO. 7 OF 2023

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE OBED BOAZ LAIZER....................... DECEASED

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION

FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION BY SUZAN OBED LAIZER............................. PETITIONER

RULING 27/07/2023 & 31/07/2023 GWAE, J The petitioner herein is the wife of the deceased one OBED BOAZ LAIZER who died intestate on the 1st day November 2017. The deceased person and petitioner were blessed with the following five issues during subsistence of the marriage; Upendo Obed Laizer (Daughter), Marry Obed Laizer (Daughter), Adelaida Obed Laizer (Daughter), Alfred Obed Laizer (Son) and Thomas Obed Laizer (Son). To make the records clear, this is the second petition filed by the petitioner seeking for letters of administration to administer the estate of her late husband. In the first petition (Probate and Administration Cause No. 16 of 2018) this Court before Mzuna, J now retired, J granted the i petitioner letters of administration to administer the estate of her late husband and the same was issued on 13th June 2019. According to the petition the petitioner administered the estate of the deceased and filed inventory and accounts in Probate and Administration Cause No. 16 of 2018 and the same was closed but unfortunately, she later on found out that she left out some of the properties including the bank accounts which she had no knowledge of their existence at the time of administration of the deceased estate. As the Probate and Administration Cause No. 16 of 2018 has already been closed, the petitioner has filed this fresh petition seeking to be granted letters of administration to administer the remaining estate of her late father. The following unadministered properties have been listed in the petition, which are to be administered by the petitioner if this petition is granted; 1. One farm measuring 25 acres located at Naitolya Village, Makuyuni Ward in Monduli District.

2. CRDB Bank Account No. 01J2085256001 the account name is OBED BOAZ LAIZER.

3. CRDB Bank Account No. 01J24852500 the account name is OBED BOAZ LAIZER.

4. CRDB Bank Account No. 01J2049038600 Account name is OBED BOAZ LAIZER. 2 5. CRDB Bank Account No. 01J2085256000 Account name is OBED BOAZ LAIZER.

6. Motor Vehicle make Toyota Corolla with registration No. T 937 ATU When this matter was called on for hearing, the petitioner appeared in person unrepresented. However, she reiterated what she stated in her petition. In addition, she produced original birth certificate and Marriage certificate. Going through the records of this application and considering the fact that the petitioner had once been appointed by this Court to administer the estate of her late husband and having established that there are some properties whose their existence came to the knowledge of the petitioner after the previous Probate Cause had already been closed. Thus, they are subject to administration to the surviving heirs of the deceased including the petitioner who is the widow. The persons who are given priority to grant of probate or letters of administration are always those interested in the estate. I would like to fortify my holding by the decision of the Court of Appeal in Naftary Petro vs. Marry Protas (2019) T.L.R 561 where it was held 'Thus, any person, who, according to the rules for the distribution of the estate of an intestate applicable in the 3 “URT: "sm»» «« the inventory by the administratrix. 31/07/2023 5

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Naftary Petro vs. Marry Protas (2019) T.L.R 561

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.