19901023 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The evidence sufficiently established that the properties were matrimonial assets acquired and developed by the couple, justifying the division as ordered by the lower courts.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19901023 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Lily Mconi Etibwo; Respondent: Enrion Limiri
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Second Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Property, Division of Assets
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lily Mconi Etibwo
Appellant
Enrion Limiri
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the property in question was matrimonial property acquired and developed by the married couple
- 2 Whether the division of the property by the lower courts was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence sufficiently established that the properties were matrimonial assets acquired and developed by the couple, justifying the division as ordered by the lower courts.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Decision of the lower courts confirmed
- Division of the matrimonial assets as previously ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
:1 III T:-:;s FTGE CO:Ji.lT OF TLITZJ.ITIJ. (PC) CIVIL A1:'i::SJ;L ITO~ 62 OF 1990 (Fro□ tho docicion of tho District Court oX Mnfin in Civil 2ovision hoo 1 of. 1990) Oi.:.IGIIJi'..L CT'1IL Cll3:2 nc. 11 0 OF 1 90 OF :~TLiiDOlJI ~ ~,.,.---~-~ ?~-~II·J;l:.-7 COUUT .....,.................. ............................ ~ e o vcrouo • • 0 • • • e • .o • • o 2.:SSPOID31JT This .. is - n soconc'. n:;_J:i_)Oc,1. by li.lly Mconi Etibwo. nc;cinot concui~rcnt:~ £'inclines. o:f :foct thc..t 1-,.0 o:.12r.c i·.:2.t1~ir.1011inl o.ssots with Enrio.r:1 li.r:.1iri~ Doth thOB:0. courts hnd fm;;nd oot2tblishoc1 that tho proporty i..'11.v:olv:o.d in this c.c.so wore two ::fr:2r.1iJc.tJ th2. t hnc.l boon nc.quiro.c1 anc.l dcv-0.lo::;:-od by tho □ nrriod couple. I :find tho.so .::inclinc;s contrnry to tho, ,-mrc in :fnct ncquiroc.l in tho r.10;,1110:1.~ stnto.cl by tho lower court!:;~. The ·oviclonco cstnblishin(;' tl-:io :fnct is sufficient. li.lso justifiocl by tho oviclcnco io tho division of the sl").cr.1;Jns thnt tho.. :first:; nppollo::t·c court 1:10.c~c thcrooy con:fi:r-□inc; tho decision -··o:f tho lco.1.--nod JU:JGE _ 23/10/1990 C-0r.nr.1: HUDJ:.111. , J e Appcllnnt•s advocnto - nbsont- ;,1asponc.lont ... pro.sent. Juc.c;r.1cnt dolivcroc:. JUJGE