lisa e peter vs al hushoom investment 2016 tzca 902 20 september 2016
The affidavit was invalid for lack of the applicant's signature below the verification clause, which is a mandatory requirement to affirm the genuineness and authenticity of the deposed allegations. As a result, the application was fatally vitiated and struck out.
- Citation
- lisa e peter vs al hushoom investment 2016 tzca 902 20 september 2016
- Parties
- Applicant: Lisa E. Peter; Respondent: Al-Hushoom Investment
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Affidavit in Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Affidavit Requirements, Extension of Time, Verification Clause, Striking Out Applications
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lisa E. Peter
Applicant
Al-Hushoom Investment
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Affidavit in Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's affidavit is invalid for lack of signature below the verification clause
- 2 Whether the affidavit lacks proper verification as to means of knowledge or source of information
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit was invalid for lack of the applicant's signature below the verification clause, which is a mandatory requirement to affirm the genuineness and authenticity of the deposed allegations. As a result, the application was fatally vitiated and struck out.
Court Disposition
Application struck out with costs
Orders
- The application is struck out with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment