20151222 TZHC Arusha
The application for revision was time barred and thus incompetent; even if timely, no illegality or impropriety was shown in the primary court's decision; appeal dismissed for lack of merit.
- Citation
- 20151222 TZHC Arusha
- Parties
- Appellant: Loiruki John Nicodemus; Appellant: Modest John Nicodemus; Respondent: Elirehema Lebayo Mollel
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Administration, Distribution of Estate, Customary Law, Limitation Period, Revision Proceedings
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Loiruki John Nicodemus
Appellant
Modest John Nicodemus
Appellant
Elirehema Lebayo Mollel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants were entitled to inherit the deceased's estate under Waarusha customary law
- 2 Whether the District Court revision was competent given the limitation period
- 3 Whether the respondent's appointment and distribution of estate was proper
Ratio Decidendi
The application for revision was time barred and thus incompetent; even if timely, no illegality or impropriety was shown in the primary court's decision; appeal dismissed for lack of merit.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs as it emanated from an incompetent application for revision before the District Court which was time barred.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment