20050905 TZHC Arusha
The suit is incompetent in law for failure to comply with Order I Rule 8 regarding representative suits, as the plaintiff did not obtain leave of the court or give notice to other interested persons. The non-joinder of the Attorney General does not render the suit incompetent, but the failure to comply with representative suit procedures is fatal.
- Citation
- 20050905 TZHC Arusha
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Lois Hive Jacob; Defendant: Mick; Defendant: Letion Sulana; Defendant: Morodi Ole Kunani; Defendant: Meingeti Ole Musando; Defendant: Kitasho Simel; Defendant: Parmeth Lomonyemi; Defendant: Metui Ole Kileya
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 5 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Suit struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Non Joinder of Necessary Parties, Representative Suits, Preliminary Objections, Land Ownership, Government Land
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lois Hive Jacob
Plaintiff
Mick
Defendant
Letion Sulana
Defendant
Morodi Ole Kunani
Defendant
Meingeti Ole Musando
Defendant
Kitasho Simel
Defendant
Parmeth Lomonyemi
Defendant
Metui Ole Kileya
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is incompetent for non-joinder of the Attorney General as a necessary party
- 2 Whether the suit is incompetent for want of leave to file a representative suit under Order I Rule 8
Ratio Decidendi
The suit is incompetent in law for failure to comply with Order I Rule 8 regarding representative suits, as the plaintiff did not obtain leave of the court or give notice to other interested persons. The non-joinder of the Attorney General does not render the suit incompetent, but the failure to comply with representative suit procedures is fatal.
Court Disposition
Suit struck out with costs
Orders
- Suit struck out for being incompetent in law for want of compliance with Order I Rule 8
- Plaintiff may pursue the claim afresh in a competent jurisdiction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment