romayan langaramu vs christopher pelo 2021 tzca 35 25 february 2021
The applicant met all statutory conditions for stay of execution: timely application, demonstration of potential substantial loss if execution proceeds, and provision of adequate security for due performance through a third party's property and affidavit.
- Citation
- romayan langaramu vs christopher pelo 2021 tzca 35 25 february 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Lomayani Langaramu; Respondent: Christopher Pelo
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Security for Due Performance, Substantial Loss, Appeals
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lomayani Langaramu
Applicant
Christopher Pelo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has met the conditions for stay of execution under Rule 11 of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant met all statutory conditions for stay of execution: timely application, demonstration of potential substantial loss if execution proceeds, and provision of adequate security for due performance through a third party's property and affidavit.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Execution of the decree of the High Court in Land Case No. 5 of 2015 is stayed pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
- The stay is conditional upon the applicant depositing the original certificate of customary right of occupancy, Title Deed No. l/ARS/36/32, in court within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment