NA TZHC Mwanza

There was no unequivocal evidence of a house sale agreement or purchase price; Shs. 20,000/= was advance rent for two years, Shs. 60,000/= was mortgage money to be refunded; plaintiff not entitled to specific performance, compensation for currency devaluation, or damages for improvements; defendant not entitled to damages for alterations or monthly rent.

Citation: NA TZHC Mwanza
Parties: Plaintiff: Lucia Kitano; Defendant: Petro Misenge
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 1 January 1986
Procedural Posture: Civil Suit / Final Judgment
Outcome: Plaintiff's suit dismissed except for refund of Shs. 60,000/=; defendant's counterclaims dismissed except for refund.
Legal Topics: Specific Performance, Mistake in Contract, Mortgage, Tenancy, Damages, Currency Devaluation, Oral Evidence, Documentary Evidence
Source Language: English

Contract Law Property Law Evidence Law Specific Performance Mistake in Contract Mortgage Tenancy Damages +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Lucia Kitano

Plaintiff

Petro Misenge

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether there was a valid house sale agreement between plaintiff and defendant
2 Whether Shs. 20,000/= was advance rent or part payment for house purchase
3 Whether Shs. 60,000/= was mortgage money or purchase price

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's suit dismissed except for refund of Shs. 60,000/=; defendant's counterclaims dismissed except for refund.

Orders

Defendant to refund plaintiff Shs. 60,000/= within six months
No order for specific performance