rashidi v united republic of tanzania application no 0092015 2019 afchpr 10 28 march 2019
The Applicant's arrest and deportation while possessing valid documents and awaiting replacement passport constituted a violation of his right to residence and freedom of movement. The anal search performed in the presence of his children was degrading, violated his dignity and physical integrity. The seven-year...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- rashidi v united republic of tanzania application no 0092015 2019 afchpr 10 28 march 2019
- Parties
- Applicant: Lucien Ikili Rashidi; Respondent State: United Republic of Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment (merits and Reparations)
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; Respondent State found in violation of Articles 4, 5, 7(1)(d), and 12(1) of the Charter.
- Legal Topics
- Right to Residence, Freedom of Movement, Right to Dignity, Right to Be Tried Within a Reasonable Time, Degrading Treatment, Physical Integrity
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lucien Ikili Rashidi
Applicant
United Republic of Tanzania
Respondent State
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment (merits and Reparations)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant's arrest and deportation violated his rights to residence and freedom of movement under Article 12(1) of the Charter
- 2 Whether the anal search performed on the Applicant constituted a violation of his right to dignity under Article 5 of the Charter and integrity under Article 4
- 3 Whether the delay of almost seven years in delivering judgment violated the Applicant's right to be tried within a reasonable time under Article 7(1)(d)
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicant's arrest and deportation while possessing valid documents and awaiting replacement passport constituted a violation of his right to residence and freedom of movement. The anal search performed in the presence of his children was degrading, violated his dignity and physical integrity. The seven-year delay in trial was unreasonable and violated his right to be tried within a reasonable time. The Respondent State is responsible for these violations and must provide reparations.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; Respondent State found in violation of Articles 4, 5, 7(1)(d), and 12(1) of the Charter.
Orders
- Respondent State to pay Applicant TZS 10,000,000 for moral damage from anal search and violation of dignity and integrity.
- Respondent State to pay Applicant's wife and children TZS 1,000,000 each for moral damage suffered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment