rashidi v united republic of tanzania application no 0092015 2019 afchpr 10 28 march 2019

rashidi v united republic of tanzania application no 0092015 2019 afchpr 10 28 march 2019

The Applicant's arrest and deportation while possessing valid documents and awaiting replacement passport constituted a violation of his right to residence and freedom of movement. The anal search performed in the presence of his children was degrading, violated his dignity and physical integrity. The seven-year...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
rashidi v united republic of tanzania application no 0092015 2019 afchpr 10 28 march 2019
Parties
Applicant: Lucien Ikili Rashidi; Respondent State: United Republic of Tanzania
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
28 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment (merits and Reparations)
Outcome
Application allowed in part; Respondent State found in violation of Articles 4, 5, 7(1)(d), and 12(1) of the Charter.
Legal Topics
Right to Residence, Freedom of Movement, Right to Dignity, Right to Be Tried Within a Reasonable Time, Degrading Treatment, Physical Integrity
Source Language
english
Human Rights International Law Right to Residence Freedom of Movement Right to Dignity Right to Be Tried Within a Reasonable Time Degrading Treatment Physical Integrity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lucien Ikili Rashidi

Applicant

United Republic of Tanzania

Respondent State

Procedural Posture

Application / Judgment (merits and Reparations)

  1. 1 Whether the Applicant's arrest and deportation violated his rights to residence and freedom of movement under Article 12(1) of the Charter
  2. 2 Whether the anal search performed on the Applicant constituted a violation of his right to dignity under Article 5 of the Charter and integrity under Article 4
  3. 3 Whether the delay of almost seven years in delivering judgment violated the Applicant's right to be tried within a reasonable time under Article 7(1)(d)

Ratio Decidendi

The Applicant's arrest and deportation while possessing valid documents and awaiting replacement passport constituted a violation of his right to residence and freedom of movement. The anal search performed in the presence of his children was degrading, violated his dignity and physical integrity. The seven-year delay in trial was unreasonable and violated his right to be tried within a reasonable time. The Respondent State is responsible for these violations and must provide reparations.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; Respondent State found in violation of Articles 4, 5, 7(1)(d), and 12(1) of the Charter.

Orders

  • Respondent State to pay Applicant TZS 10,000,000 for moral damage from anal search and violation of dignity and integrity.
  • Respondent State to pay Applicant's wife and children TZS 1,000,000 each for moral damage suffered.