final ruling LUCY TRACY JOACKIM MINDE Tanzlii

final ruling LUCY TRACY JOACKIM MINDE Tanzlii

The application was incompetent as it was brought under provisions (Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC) that do not empower the court to grant interim orders or stay of execution in probate matters. Additionally, the affidavit was defective for lack of the deponent's signature in the jurat, leaving the application without a valid supporting affidavit.

Citation
final ruling LUCY TRACY JOACKIM MINDE Tanzlii
Parties
Applicant: Lucy Tracy Joakim Minde; 1st Respondent: Laura Joakim Minde; 2nd Respondent: Valentine Joakim Minde
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Outcome
Application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Affidavit Defects, Jurisdiction, Probate Administration
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lucy Tracy Joakim Minde

Applicant

Laura Joakim Minde

1st Respondent

Valentine Joakim Minde

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objections

  1. 1 Whether the application is competent before the court
  2. 2 Whether the affidavit is defective for lack of deponent's signature
  3. 3 Whether the court was properly moved under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC

Ratio Decidendi

The application was incompetent as it was brought under provisions (Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC) that do not empower the court to grant interim orders or stay of execution in probate matters. Additionally, the affidavit was defective for lack of the deponent's signature in the jurat, leaving the application without a valid supporting affidavit.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Application struck out for being incompetent
  • No order as to costs