19880330 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The conviction and sentence against the appellant were quashed and set aside because the trial court failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of section 231(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act by not informing the accused of his rights to testify and call witnesses, which is a serious procedural irregularity that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19880330 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Ludwine Matthew; Respondent: Republic of Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence in District Court
- Outcome
- Conviction quashed, sentence set aside, retrial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Burglary, Theft, Right to Fair Trial, Mandatory Procedural Rights, Retrial
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ludwine Matthew
Appellant
Republic of Tanzania
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence in District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction of the appellant was proper based on the evidence adduced
- 2 Whether the trial court complied with section 231(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding informing the accused of his rights to testify and call witnesses
- 3 Whether failure to comply with mandatory procedural requirements vitiated the trial
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction and sentence against the appellant were quashed and set aside because the trial court failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of section 231(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act by not informing the accused of his rights to testify and call witnesses, which is a serious procedural irregularity that goes to the root of the case and cannot be cured. Additionally, the evidence relied upon by the trial court was insufficient and improperly evaluated.
Court Disposition
Conviction quashed, sentence set aside, retrial ordered
Orders
- The conviction against the appellant is quashed.
- The sentence against the appellant is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IlT T:.IE I:IG:I COG.RT OF "i'AtJZALTIJ. L..??ELLLr11E JTDI3JICTION :IIGI:: CCL£t.:.1 c:,_~J:l]J]TJ.1 J.P?Ei.L HO. i 23 0]' 1987 (:i_;'-_con oriG°ino..l Cri:·.1il1d Cc-se Fo.2G2 of -1906 o:f th0 District Co1.D:-t of 11:cl.-,, Dist;;iot :-:,t Kisutu)_. LJJIDLIHE Ml'..TTIEli • 1 I , , + • , • • • • ; • • ~ o 1 •- • o I 1 ~ • 6 o f I • ~ > • o o • o • .J..PPELL.[Jf.i: ( Oric:inc'.,l :~001..wcd) versu.s ~~l~JD UJJITED TIEPOJ3LIC ~ • , c • , ~ , ~ o c " • a o e o o ; \) o o .. :) • t o ~ • o o :o • • &:,;~~SPQ:.;])~l(' (Oricin01 i~~oscoutor) ------ JUDGE r1 E-H T of' Il:::.1;:-, '.".t ;.~1 su:'7.1:, D~,;;." e: s 80L---,:V:1 rte(;-ion 1-ri th t~1-e of:fcnc€ s o1 ~10'0.so lxrcdct.1-ic c/s 29:t~ c-..11,,_ st€clD.1c; c/s 265 of ·i;he Pon.::-.,1 Coe.le. Disr/Gis:ficcl liy the oonvio•cirn.1 c.:,1c'. o~::.1-t::m.000 :1c h2.,s 2,ppcc.lecl to this CO'tU7i 2.ncl his Lovrn:r Court ,"XC t}:~t t].:o oo::i~)l;:,:i.nd1.t.s one ncc;:i.112, Tbbuln. ( Pl·12), ;~111 c;:1ployoe of Tc.nzc:n:i.2' Lwe ot:.1cnt TI:-..nk ( TJJ3) 1-r:7..s 2..t t:-..c n;-,,-tGri::.l ti::10 livine in 2, SIDO hos-tel. I:J:::in. zu ( PU3 ) c.',.,.""lcl sGconc1 r.ocuscc'!. in t!:.o Dis•0riot Court i}U-t W'.'-·S r.-..cqt).ittec1. on 1Jo-'.;:.1 t>o counts.- T!:o tb.J:Ge parsons in ·t]:.o OT(!.G~c.. I J_'..'.'.,VC set Ot'!.t [',iJOVG li vccl :i.11 l"00i:lS 21}, 25 IlG"~ rn.72) 'l" ( J.-V° ~l.J.,.:.LJ '·· ~(~ .:...:.l~!.., ::;.-.io;1;:; o thcr :i.11 his roon r~ s~wo I'c'..(~io o.ncl o.. Gowin[; n::c:'J.ine. On 19/2/86 the c1ey hex tl:.:i.ncs, inoluclil1-.:; tho r::u:lio, ucrc stolen fron hor 1•00 s in l'Iorocoro-6 Wh-~lc '.'..t I-Io:.:o(;'oro PW: rccoivoc1_ n. tclcp]~one cc.,11 r..nc1. w-'cs inf'or- r.1oc.l of' the tho1:•;;,r She ~.:G·mr;1cc1. to Dr.x cs Sf'..1:-:,..:n i;:i:..1oc1ic'..tely, ·. Sho oa.rriocl t:,o ovid01:.co :;y PH4 :i.n ·c>.3 Lower Court, tJ.:.,..,_;c :i.;1 tho nic;ht o:i: 20/2/1906 i,o~ innoc"'..fr.,te:,Y z-:£-cGl' nirl-~'li:~"'.'ht of 19/2/86~ wl::.ilo on c":.uty "t t::o go..te W'.,S :1oi11c ,:,,,t ih0t ti1~c o:::' ·1:;::,.o nii::'.1t, Tl,;chcw iG ::12..icl to hr.:vc in:fornccl the 1mtoh1Jc:.i"1 th2.;c ho w:-'.,O cc~1c; ·co Kisut-u ~)ti.s st."·.nc1 to oeo off' ?io:;:,0 I-lism10~ of' the IIostcl c"'.,tc,. P!'lf~ now 1Jco;:•..DG susp0otio11s.., It is in -bl:.G rooor-cl o:f the Lower Co·:.U:t th,....,t Piorro 1:..:,.i'.. loft his ko;rs to Zoph:mio.,. '- June. ( PW4) o.skod Zeph;:'JU.c.. ;i.1 c'J,Yobody hN:l :o.1oclcocl at tho cloo:r ot P:i.errG 's roon. Tho ::11s1-io:r WC',s in the noc;C',t:i.vo. It waulc1. 2:;,•pcC'..r ·lihv:b Jur.12. wru1t0d to lmve ·t:1:i.s inf'oI'lX',:t'ion to lil'ik Ho..thow' s story tlmt ho wv,i;; 5oinc to see off Pierre .:i.t Kisu.tu 1ms st[121cl on lris wcy to T 2,ll[_;t¼ Fron the story of' ·tho wc,tchr.1[121, Ilo:::;':i.i1.2, ( PW2) 1)GCOL1G suspeciaus on the conduct of rl>t:.1Gw C'.11.d Pierro so she wnntocl to lrnow r.10:20 fron then. As Pierre we.s livi11,e; next :rootl to PW2 '1s roon, Roci.i.1.,'.", cleoicled to ooiif'ro11t Pierre 2ncl ,..,_,sked hin if ho lmcw d,yi;hin{; al:Jaut the ·i;::eft. There wc.,s notllinc forth oo:-.1inc fron Pierre c'J.tlloU[;h, as the ov:l.clo110e w2..s stn.tod, Pierre pronisocl to ic.SSist in tr<'.Ci,v_; tho culprit~ Durin(,· t!1e snno period, th<-,t is c.,l)out 20/2/06 TI.oc;:i.n2, not ~t~.thei-r·-- tl--.o C',;1pollant, Lccorclinc; to ilee;ina, t7:e ap1,ellant took on l:is heels on soc:i.nc PW2. Ll thou~h PW2 clicl 11ot scy in tho. lower court; thd £:ho hc..cl soucht tho n,ssistru1cc of police to .:'..I'J."cst PiGrro, there wo.,s the oviclenoc of Ho, 114 Cpl So;i.cl ( PW1 ) who tGsJcified to the cff'oct that on 2/3/[Yj ho wns c.,pproachocl by Ilc5m2,, Thc..t s;.10 reported i:;o hin thc.,t she h<'.Cl seen Jelle thiof sho hod reported to ·bh0 police e2.rlicr on.., PWl Ct.CCorJpc.J.ri.ocl PW2 c.ncl went to Zcncld. Stroot w:ioro tho wi tn0ssos s0w Pierre 011cl 2l10·li210r porso1~, n(?jnoly, Vinod. ( PW5), li.cco:rclinc to PHl, Racina pointccl ·;;o Pierro r,s the person who hc.c~ sfole.i."1 her tl:ri.1:ics. On beinG intorro:::;decl 1Jy Pv0. 9 Pierre ·is se-.icl to b . vo 2..diJ.itJced sollinc P1·12's rru:lio to V1i11ocl •. Pv15, V:i.nocl.9 clicl not resist, :inste['.(.1, :.10 led PW1 nncl PW2 to one NohCJJGc1. ( ptf6), lfohonecl 0.1JTeed to have boucht 0,10 rnclio co.,ssotte f:r•on Pierre nc[',inst c, 1000lly wi"i tten receipt - botl: t!.1e rNlio c::.nc1. rocoipt were producoc1 :'..s Tizrll. 1 m1c:l 2 respectively., Pvll t:.~011 c..rros-'cecl Pierre, the second Mcusccl. in ·1ihe lLowor Court,. On or oJJout the sr-.DG clny, i.o. 2G/2/19'J6 I-bthew, tho ['.,l)l)ollmt wns ['.T-rostod4 J.ccorclinc to Rec:i.110.. ( PW2) 9 sho r.1et Nnthew s01:101-1!1er0 in the tovm. Whcm the appellmt s:ie:;htecl PW2 ho took on his hools bu:'c wuJ ~:..i.:rosted by police on pn.trol. Lt polioo str'..tion tho 0,l)pol12.nt is scicl to ho..ve 012,ined that tho thief of PW2' s property w;-,s Piene. Finclly bot7.1 U.,thew c'.ml Pierro were chc.rcoc1.. 1-r.i.th bti.r0 lc,ry end stocline in the Di:::t:cict Court. Yett Pierro clninecl ~ his oviclcnce in t:.10 District Cot.u"'t thc.t it ,... w.::-,s tho o,ppollant who h:-,cl :c.skcd hin to holp lookinc for a 1:ruyor to buy. a 1~C'.Llio. This wa.s on 19/2/06 2.t nbout 10.00 c..n., when tho two not c.,i; the st<'..!' Cinena. Pierre cot 1ris :friend Vined ( Pl•T.5) r.incl tho lo,tter oontrD..Cted IIohcnod ( PW6) who boucllt tho rnclio o.ncl Pierro issued hin vr.i. th 0 written o!li t • All this tino t:10 o..ppollant did not wi tnoss the tr.:msMtion .. The inportMt q1..1es·aon 11.ovr to consicler ::incl dcciclo is whothor the tric,l court was r:i.cht when _r.clJ,-~ ··. on the ovidonco of tho 1r2:tol1r.1u.n ( PW4) c.ncl th..,t of tho co.-2.0cusecl ( PiorTe) to convict tho n.ppellm1t.. The Ilopublic 3/..... is not support:i.n[s thG 0011vic-i,ion. Nr 0 Sen[;uji, Lcc.ri1oc1 Stc,te !~tto:cnoy corJ.--sotly subni ttecl thc.:li tl1c 0ller;od briGf CC'..SO by tho appcllc....11.t ,bs not ej~:J:Jinoc1 -!)Y PWt~ tb hsocrtc'.,:Ln hS to 1-th;::,;l; WC'..S c10tuo..lly in the 1J~. It is clso not know11 wl:C'..t id.r.10 PiGrie left his room ;:i.ncl whether he he.cl 61-iy"tllinG whGn ho left t!.10 (.'..'i"'.--bG 2,t Siclo r.:.otel. · Thero w8.s oJ.so so;.10_ c1ou~Jt~ c.s wc.s also. obsc1"'Vecl lJY 1.1r., Sol'l(;Uji, c.,s whether the ~10-2,·ocl be:e could hc.,vo caxricc'.. o..11 tho coDpln:i.nant I s thincs includinc 0 sew:b'l[; 1:1""cl1in0 - which could not hc-,vo OC'..sily be insortGd in tho tac. Tl~e evidence o:f PW4 is noJli L.1prcssivo Mel bel:J,.evc:blo ci ther. The nppcllant is sc.,id to have cone ou"li of Cicl.o c2.,G0 o.,t e.bout 1~00 C'..,.m 4 This wc.,s c., vary 0wkwc.rd hour. of t?:i.o 11.ic;ht when Dost people woro slcopiric. Tho 2.l)pollant. w2,s not c.t tho uderial tino 0 rE:siclent of the.t hostel r.llLl one wonc":..ers .-rby the wc..tchnc.n m,,s not sensi tivo o.ncl rosponsiblo of his duty to c1enr.:nd for c1. soc:rch in tho <>PPello.nt ts 1J2C. PW4 clicl not soeo. to bo _s-urprisGcl when told l)y -b:.::.e o..i;:Jello.nt thc.,t he w1.:,s c;oing- to sE:c of:f Piorre Qt Kisutu when infc.ct b.o w:.,s ;,,lone oncl did not bother to <'-Sk ·t;ho c,p~,cllant :?or the where-o..bouts of Pierro. It clicl not ov-cn strilce his m:i.n:l JG).1..-,.,t. l)UGGS to T2l1Gc1., or up om.,mt:ry cenerc1.lly lee.Yo Do.r cs S2..lc:,2D. eithGI' in tho BOJ:'.llinl; or in tho eveninc. It 14'oulcl c..ppoc.:r therefore, in qy- nincl, t;.18.t the GViclence 9f PW4 is o.. concocted, one 2.11.cl it should not hc.-we 1Jeen reliecl upon by tho Loc.:rnocl Trir,_l H::-0 istrate n.s the lJrisis for conv:i.cti;.1C.;· tho c'.pp0- llc..11·co Ifod the tricl nc{.;·iotr2..tc oonsiclorcd the evidence of' PW4 O['J;ef'ully1 ho should have f'ouncl tlmt t::e only oviclonco loft to clocicle on t:,10 f'D.,te of the o..:ppellont w.~s the,t o:Z t:10 co-Mcusecl PiGtie. In othonrol"cl:::, PlT4' s eviclonco _could no lonco:r servo c..s i11d0penc1G11t eviclonco to cor.:ro"!:>orntc I Piarre ts oviclence;: It ic ·::-,lw,:i,ys tho lc.w!l encl I ['.[1 pleo..socl th<>t lh', Sene-uji o,lso pointed this to .~e, th;,t <> parson shoulcl l)o convictecl on t::G strencth of the prosecution C[',se encl not on the weclr..t1Gss of clof'onco oc,so~ There wrc vc..rious nuthori tics on this point by_ the Court c;ncl the Court c.,bovo ru-id I find it no point to re~He 2.ny one of them here., Tho prosoc· , •. ,n must prove their c0s0 l)eyoncl .:1-ry sci.11till2. of: cloulJt ,:'.ncl tho court s~10·..:i.J.t1· not 011 01\Y clay~ or incident use the defence C[',SO to fill in the cc,,ps in tho oc..se for prosccutiono- The tri8.l T1IDGistr2,te clic7- not o.1so ovcluo..to tho evidence of PiGXr0 nncl oz:OL1ine his conduct vocy closolyll Consicler:i.11.g his conduct fron tho · tine the of:t:enco wo.s 0l1G3ec1ly ·conni ttccl to the. tine of' his c..rrcst o.. ro<'.;s6,no.ble court woulc1 not }:c[',VO f n.ilocl to cone to c1 proper conclusiollci Tho hurelzj cm.cl theft were C'..llG:;ed to hc..vc beon corn:iittecl on 01° 2,bout ·_: ' of ·19/2/06 when PW2 wG.s on scl:--1"i in Morocoro, One/hor closet ncichbour W0S Pierre., . On 19/2/06 Piorro uon~ to buy :--. ticlcot to tr2.:vol to Tc.nc;a.i, :D':i:om his mm oviclonco he ~cft l)y bus :i.11 the ovon:i.11c to Tmc.::. CJ1d ocno ~ It W0S · not shown. i...-i. the tricl court for whd. rc::-..son ' . ~ Pierre he:d e;ono ·to Tc,.'1.c_:o.. 1Y1.,~Jii · i"h. woulcl o...ppoo.r th;',t . Pi or.re wo.ntcd to oroa.te cin o.J..ibi,.. Ilowovert I shonlr:7- not pursue this point ns it -vms not directly -. . . r.:'.is_ocl. ' But; ~11 in. ,;11, considoru1e; Pisrro i·s· _00:.1.c.lu?t on tb.G llcy PW2·1 s iiJ.:111[;s wore stolen, n1c.~ C'..lso ii.1 vie1·r of the fc..ct tho:t it w,,s Pio1"i'o who s3lcl . . . to PW6 c1~oc.tc [', ro;-:,so!_lc.,blo inforronco to tl'.c ef':foot thd PW:! 1 s Dc.d.io )}- Pierre vtout&' h~wo boon f01:mcl by the trir.,l 'catw:t ~bro 'conncctccl wit11 the l'eo:#Jonsibility of the Co::rr.tls0:i,011 of tho cr:i.nG tb.::.:1 it woull1 hC'.,VG boon to c:.-ry body else. In my opm'lion, h(l.(l tho 1or.:rnocl ti'"io..l ro$ic7.ont H,.c;istr2.to , ' a,pprcisod tho prosccutionrs cviclonco.ciliofully, ho woulclhr.vo 00;:.10 to· r.. clifforcnt conclusion 0S Y3r.i11st tho ono n01·r on rGcorcl, It woulcl c.lso c.,1:ipc.:,x, 2.s it wo.,s vicorausly ,:.:rrruecl by fib:. So:;.1c:,uj i, f'or the Ilcpublic the.:!; tho Lec.:rnocl trio..l 1,k,gis-lir2,to e.rred' in Lrn·r ih not oonplying with the provisions of section 231 (1) c..nd (b) of tho C1~;L·.tl11c.l · . .. FTocccluro Act No.i-9 of 1985. '11his section 1·oquires n. trial cO'l.ll'-t to infom r11 accused person of his rici~JG fo cc.,ll his witncrnsos if he wishocl. l have cone throu~h the _prooe:;od.il.1Cs of thG c2,so 211cl. I 2.L'1 so..:tisfiod tht,:b t21cir0 is 110 whoro it w2,s inclic2..tod thc.t -the tri'..1.,1 court clicl Worn thG 2.ccusoc.l 1 pGrson ·· ( n.ppellc.n t) oi' his str-;butocy rich ts 2-s provided by soct:i.011 231( 1 )~ - fo1.. 0c,s0 reference, c-.ncl for'' tho r~pose of this o..ppenl, tho rol0v,1,.1.1t. provision is horeuncler rop1"'0cl:uced:- "231-(1) At the closo· of tho oviclonco' j_j_1 S'U~)port of tho ch2rc;o' if it 2..ppoc.:rs to the ooUJ:t th2..t e, 02,so is mo..de out r.c.:±t1st tho 2.0ousod person su:fficientJ..y to rGquiro hi.in ·Go nc.ko clofenco ci tb.or in rel2.tio11 to ·bho offonoo w;i.tli, which ho is chGXc;ocl 01"' il1 re~D..:.; tion to ru.zy- other offonco of which t1rnlor tho pro-visions of section 312-321 inclusive of this Act ho is lin.blo to be. conv:i.ctec., tho 00'1..ti"t she1.ll nco.ilJ. e:-;:plc:in inclusive substt.11co of the . ch2.XC;"G to tho r.ccusoc1 nncl inforr:i h:i.;J of :.....i.s '.'·'i (a) to c;t.vo ov:i.donoe whether or not on o::.th or not on oath or affirmo.tion, on his own bohn.lf; (1J) · to 02.11 wi tnossos on his ovm bohclf; ;:ind shcll thon c.sk tho c1,0cus·0a, or his ,'.1,ClVoc2..t0, if ho intends to oxorciso <'l'JY of tho c.bove_ 1~ichts encl shill record ·tho 011swo:r, Tho court shall them cc,11 on tho accusocl porr.,on· to entor on his dtfence sc.me whore tho 2,0cusod does not wish· to 0xorcis0 ~ither of tho c.bovo ri[.;htn • 5 Tl'lGre is· no c:.ou;yi; 1 f-r-0::.1 the c'.1?cp-a. p1°ovisb11.s, thr,t tJ.1.0 oouri; l:.O,S . :, no option but r:ru._st co:1pl;r t; ·terns c.nc,_ nom,pic of tl:r.-t' k.1·r. :.s t):,cro is no rccorc: to show tl.:c,t Jcho tri[1,l U'7[;is'.i;rr•.:i;e co:~1pliecl wit~: t::..o s2.icl n211cl2.tory provisions, in qy view, I l:olcl thr..t this w::.s ::-.. serious error which wont into the roo·i; of the c::.,sc me:. sv.ch error, in err o:;_·:>:i.nion, o.nc1 H is richtly so, cc-.11:.1o·li bo cv.rocl unclcr section 300,:]. of Cl'ir.ri.:.1f,l Prococluro Act which proviclcs&- 11 3GG( 1 ) sub joct to tho provisions l~.c1"'cil1 l)oforo oont.-:.inocl no finrlinc; or sontcmcc or O::i:c'.o:r n,flo or pa,ssocl by r, court of cor.1p0tont ju.::."i rJc".iction s-1:.~,J.l bo rovorsccl or c:ltorc,".. on c.,ppGr-,1 or rovi- sio~1 011 2.CCOU-11.t of r:-1,Y 0l'TOr. ODission or irrG- (;"l).lo;ri ty in the conpl2.,int, SUt"J."JOns, w2.Xr2.nt, cll::'XGG, procl:v.1t1,tion, orcler, jv.r'lf,'T.:GnJG or in ,-:-ny il1cru.ixy or other 1,rooooc"'..ings 1.mcler this ll.ct; save t::o.,t whore on 2,ppo2..l or revision, tI,.o oou.rt is s2/cisi'iGcl ·till·:i,t such arror onission or L."'2'c:.:,i.tlu.ri ty '..12.,s occ11ssionec1 c. fdluro chf justice, t:.10 court r.12y oz-clor 2, retrial or Ddco such other orc''.c:r '"G it nay oonsi~lor just 2.ncl ccru.1..tn,blG" • How since the appollr:-J.'l"G wo,s not 2.skocl wl:otI.1or or not 1'.o shoulcl GiVG · his oVidcnoe on Or-1.th/n.ffirnation, or 11.ot, 2nd thd he h.::.z:. e, rie;ht to o:--.:11 his wi tnossos, I consider this ooission :,s 0 serious i:i:-roc;uh.ri ty for, i.11 DY vicw, ho.,d tho nppo- llnnt boon ccluc.::.tccl Oi.1 ·bl:c 1x1nclo..t Ol"'.f :rec,;_uirc,:10nts ( wl:ich :-:3:C tlso thG ri 0hts of C,."l. '• Cl,COUSOd. person), I'lCJ:ho..ps l1G would h;:,,ve infornecl the CO-...U."'t ti1~t ho hn.d [', witness or wi tno ssc s to c cll, I:f t:.1d ho,pponorl ;:';.1c:'. soDo wi tncssos ·i;o r:ri;ificcl in support of the o.ppella.nt's clofenoo, it is 1:i.y stt1Jr.tlssion.thd tho rosu.lt of the judcswent in tho Lower CourJli uoulcl ]_1:-,.vo boon cliffcront. It r:1cy bo r-J..'C;c!Gcl thc..t the appol1211t never incorpor::..tocl tbis point in his iJGDor2nltm of c.prlec.,l ".n:1. -'i;hor . .'.:\~ro. should not 1)o discussccl here, lJut ,,s I hrovo re;.--1.-,,rk0cl c2Xlicr on, s.231 oi' C.,P.A. is a. D<-',J,1d2.,tory provision which cro::,tos 2. riG!:t to m.1 wcv.socl person 011 o~J.G hi:l1cl, Mel cJ. cluty cmcl responsibility to -tb.o Co-~:Tt on thG otb.Gr, L. fdlu:ro to COi:.llJlJi with tl:is p:rovision is a sorious ooission, orror or irrq;v.l;'.J'.'i ty ·tb.n,t coes to -t;:·,c root or subject n?..tter of tl10 cn:s0~ P.or o:;;;2.nplo ·w.hon -l;J:c r,p:,ella:n:t c;2,vo ovic1.cncc ho W[l,S not. cross- 1-n".2't is on rcoorc1. is -b:'.:~::'.-t cross-GA<.'7.Dina.tion ox,'.11.:.u.ncd by. his co-:-:,0cusoc!., Pierr0.: by th~ soconcl ;:i,ccusc(':. is ______11 Nil 11 • Nhcthor ho ( scconc':. :".Ccusccl) lmow tlmt ho _oucht to cross-G:-i;:,:;:,1i110 l.:is 00-2..ooustcl o..nc1. his wi tnosscs, or vico vorsc.1 it cnnnot now bo ascc1.,..kinoc'!. ·1)co:mso tl:ci.s Court is not St.U'G i:i:' -::;;_10 trir.1.l nnc;istrQ,to ctid conply with soc·l;ion 231 of tho C ~P.,J~, ______for ii' ho c'.icl oonply, ho oUGtt to have put all wl::::,t 1-r::,s roquirocl tu1t:.er s. 231 in wri tine, Ii' Pierre tolcl tho court thnt ho h[',(1. no ciucstion to 0sk tI:i.e ;,,.ppollnnt on w1:.,;i; tho 2,ppollnnt had. stated to cou:rt in· his o:r.:r,i.tl:.1,~-tion in chief, the cnly re2,son2,lJle inrGrronce thc1t oa.n l)e clri".:t-m is th:-:.t tho ::'.:iJpelln.nt' s oo-c1.0cusocl hG.C1. 110 quii.rrol · 6 ,,-,....,1.. with the swo:rn etr,"iiG;:.1c11t of the 2,ppoll2nt to ·tt.G court ◄ .!.'J w, wh0n Pierre took uiJ plc,tfo:rn i:1. t:1c uitnos:::,' bo:r.:, he r_;ci,vc '.'..11 cntirol;r (l..i:c:fc~ont story incrinir12.ti110 the <'-f>i_lGl1c.;.1t., In otb.orwordss t!:o:ro wc:ro now two stories, 0110 which wc.,s stc.tod. to t~1c court by ·the 2.,:)pGllc.nt <'11(:. w;-,,s 11o·b tested. or counto~hoclcocl l)y Pim.".i... G ( co-Mcuscc1)-•:,,_____,c11.cl which DGC'.J.lt i·b wa.s a. correct story, end twos the ovicloncG r;ivo;.1 by Pforrc 2.nc.l m"!.:):,_10:doc.l by DW2. Yet, tho trio.l · r.'.f::-.£;is·cr:oto prooooclod on ;:-:ncl 1)cliovec1 Pic:rr-e 1 :3 evic1once which, as rir;htly su1miJ.;tecl by the Lcc..rnoa. Stc/i;o fd;toraoy r.1r. S011_-fu.ji, wo.,s tho very oviclcncc used 1Jy t!1c· ·Griri,l court <",s <1, l);:',Sis for co1wiot:L11.c tho appellant. Without ovorst2.ti:1.c;, I nn now sntisficct f'rom the fow o"'.Jsoi,...va.tions I 11,wc i]ru:le cbovc <'.l1c'. .::-.,lso ?ron the subr:iiseionG nr-,cle by tho Lorxncc1 State Attorney on 1JohvJ.f' of tho Ilopubl.ic Jch;:,,t the error or t:.:.o o::1iosion by the t:ricJ. court is not o;;.1c t:1~/i; is cur2.-ble U11c1.or s,.3/JG(l)(C,P~L) oi·'liocl above~ 1 have no d tern2..tivo 1r,1t to orc1.cr 2., rotric.l of' J.;he ce,s0 so th:,t II justice is not onl;r clone, bt"!.t oJ.2oulcl nonifestly be soen to l)o clo~10 11 , l1.lso, 2.s I ·· se,id eo.rlicr, tb.ere Wt'.,S i;:ipropcr ev::-.lu.2,.tion of the ovie:':.enoe CAlcl because of tha.t fcilure to c:'.J.1<-,,zyoe the prosooution ·oviclonoo cr.xof'ully it enclod with 2, conviction o.ccinst t!:e :'..j_,:Jellc.'..1"1t who, in r;iy oponion, hr.el r., woclcer cc1.se to 2nswer thnn his oo-:-r.co-~wcc1 who was o.cq_ui ttecl, For tho Dr.;:10 ror,soli; tho:r:oforo, I qu.n.sh tho oonviotion, rwt ~siclo the. sontenoes o.._:;cil1st t~1e 2.,l)~Jollcnt end, :i.nste2.d a rctri<'.l of t::e .-rholo 02,so 1)efore ::-.nothor D2.[;is-'w.."'2.-to is ordered., In other worc1s tho lc-2.-:10 two a.ccuscc1 persons shou.lcl bo brow;:1t. to appe;:-.r in tl1.e so.no c.istrict ooUJ..---t 1J1_i.t before <'.llothor r:12.{;isJi:;r.:ite for tl:.o hoariJ:1'3' of th~ o.:1sc n.frosh, ·/ .'~- ( 1.. c .'rm:rrnvm.) P.ilINCIPJ.L nESIDEHT I-U..GISTR.l.::i.1E(E:ict .Jurisd) 30/3/1930 Juc'l.ecr!lont c'..olivc::... oc1 in the prcscnco of tho Ste,tc Ltto:;.'11oy Ih•,.. K0oeyG for the Republic, Tho e,ppollo..nt is r..1Jsont. Do..tec1 30/3/GG .::.,t Dro: os Scl~....n., 11 . --- 0 · (A6C J~:lEiiA) - PRnrcIPJ..L IlESIDENT ML.G~STllilTE(E:cii. Jurisd. ). 30/3/1900~