20170718 TZHC Mwanza
The composition of the Nyankanga Ward Tribunal was not properly recorded regarding members' gender, raising doubt about compliance with section 11 of the Land Disputes Courts Act 2002 Cap. 216. The matter must be reverted for proper recording before the appeal can be determined.
- Citation
- 20170718 TZHC Mwanza
- Parties
- Appellant: Luma Malima; Respondent: Gati Mirumbe
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Judgment on Second Appeal
- Outcome
- matter reverted to Nyankanga Ward Tribunal for proper recording of members' gender; costs reserved
- Legal Topics
- Tribunal Composition, Boundary Dispute, Evidence Evaluation
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Luma Malima
Appellant
Gati Mirumbe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Appeal / Judgment on Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the composition of the Nyankanga Ward Tribunal complied with statutory requirements
- 2 Whether the lower tribunals properly evaluated evidence
- 3 Whether the boundary dispute was resolved in accordance with law
Ratio Decidendi
The composition of the Nyankanga Ward Tribunal was not properly recorded regarding members' gender, raising doubt about compliance with section 11 of the Land Disputes Courts Act 2002 Cap. 216. The matter must be reverted for proper recording before the appeal can be determined.
Court Disposition
matter reverted to Nyankanga Ward Tribunal for proper recording of members' gender; costs reserved
Orders
- Matter reverted to Nyankanga Ward Tribunal for appropriate recording of members' gender who heard and determined the matter.
- Costs reserved pending determination of appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment