mabula madeji mwika and another vs republic 2020 tzhc 407 31 march 2020

The applicants are entitled to bail as the offence is bailable, the court has jurisdiction, and there is no objection from the prosecution.

Citation: mabula madeji mwika and another vs republic 2020 tzhc 407 31 march 2020
Parties: Applicant: Mabula Madeji Mwika; Applicant: Sandu Kadelya Masalu; Respondent: The Republic
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 31 March 2020
Procedural Posture: Bail Application / Ruling
Outcome: bail granted
Legal Topics: Bail, Economic Crimes, Jurisdiction
Source Language: English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Mabula Madeji Mwika

Applicant

Sandu Kadelya Masalu

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Bail Application / Ruling

1 Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial in Economic Case No. 10 of 2018
2 Whether the offence charged is bailable
3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant bail

The applicants are entitled to bail as the offence is bailable, the court has jurisdiction, and there is no objection from the prosecution.

bail granted

Each applicant to deposit cash 3,227,446.25 TZS to make a total of 6,454,892 TZS based on the principle of sharing.
Each applicant to have two reliable sureties with introduction letters from their Local Authority and a copy of either National Identity Card or Voters Registration Card.