maimuna abdallah mpanda vs tanzania postal bank ltd and another 2020 tzhclandd 51 12 february 2020

maimuna abdallah mpanda vs tanzania postal bank ltd and another 2020 tzhclandd 51 12 february 2020

Applicant was within time to file appeal as only 27 days had lapsed from the date the ruling was made available; limitation period excludes time taken to obtain copies of judgment/ruling.

Citation
maimuna abdallah mpanda vs tanzania postal bank ltd and another 2020 tzhclandd 51 12 february 2020
Parties
Applicant: Maimuna Abdallah Mpanda; 1st Respondent: Tanzania Postal Bank (Ltd); 2nd Respondent: Haverst (T) Ltd
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
12 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Limitation Period
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Limitation Period

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Maimuna Abdallah Mpanda

Applicant

Tanzania Postal Bank (Ltd)

1st Respondent

Haverst (T) Ltd

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to extension of time to file an appeal against the ruling of the District Land and Housing Tribunal

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant was within time to file appeal as only 27 days had lapsed from the date the ruling was made available; limitation period excludes time taken to obtain copies of judgment/ruling.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Time extended for applicant to lodge intended appeal within fourteen (14) days from date of ruling
  • Costs shall follow cause in the intended appeal