majuto ramadhani mputa vs sija rajabu muro another 2023 tzhclandd 32 24 january 2023

Leave to appeal is not required for decisions arising from the High Court's original jurisdiction in land matters; therefore, the application is misconceived and cannot succeed.

Citation: majuto ramadhani mputa vs sija rajabu muro another 2023 tzhclandd 32 24 january 2023
Parties: Applicant: Majuto Ramadhani Mputa; 1st Respondent: Sija Rajabu Muro; 2nd Respondent: Linus F. Lyela
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 24 January 2023
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome: Application struck out
Legal Topics: Leave to Appeal, Extension of Time, Appellate Jurisdiction, Original Jurisdiction
Source Language: English

Land Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Extension of Time Appellate Jurisdiction Original Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

Majuto Ramadhani Mputa

Applicant

Sija Rajabu Muro

1st Respondent

Linus F. Lyela

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether leave to appeal is required for decisions arising from the High Court's original jurisdiction in land matters
2 Whether the application for extension of time to file an appeal is properly before the court

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal is not required for decisions arising from the High Court's original jurisdiction in land matters; therefore, the application is misconceived and cannot succeed.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

Misc. Land Application No. 683 of 2022 struck out with no order as to costs