malando robert elisha moses v the republic 2024 tzhc 306 19 february 2024
The pleas of guilty entered by the appellants were unequivocal, properly recorded, and not the result of ambiguity, misapprehension, or coercion as alleged. The conviction and sentence were lawful, and the appeal is devoid of merit.
- Citation
- malando robert elisha moses v the republic 2024 tzhc 306 19 february 2024
- Parties
- Appellant: Malando Robert; Appellant: Elisha Moses; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Plea of Guilty, Armed Robbery, Appeal Procedure, Conviction and Sentence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Malando Robert
Appellant
Elisha Moses
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pleas of guilty entered by the appellants were unequivocal
- 2 Whether the conviction and sentence based on the plea of guilty were proper
Ratio Decidendi
The pleas of guilty entered by the appellants were unequivocal, properly recorded, and not the result of ambiguity, misapprehension, or coercion as alleged. The conviction and sentence were lawful, and the appeal is devoid of merit.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed in its entirety.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment