maneno ntacho vs the regional agriculture and livestock and another 2020 tzhc 207 28 february 2020

Court found that omission of repatriation costs in the decree, caused by court error, constituted sufficient reason for extension of time to lodge notice of appeal.

Citation: maneno ntacho vs the regional agriculture and livestock and another 2020 tzhc 207 28 february 2020
Parties: Applicant: Maneno Ntacho; 1st Respondent: The Regional Agriculture and Livestock; 2nd Respondent: The Attorney General
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 28 February 2020
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application granted
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal, Correction of Decree, Technical Delay, Illegality
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Appellate Practice Extension of Time Notice of Appeal Correction of Decree Technical Delay Illegality

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4

Parties

Maneno Ntacho

Applicant

The Regional Agriculture and Livestock

1st Respondent

The Attorney General

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether sufficient cause exists for extension of time to lodge notice of appeal
2 Whether technical delay and illegality in decree justify extension

Ratio Decidendi

Court found that omission of repatriation costs in the decree, caused by court error, constituted sufficient reason for extension of time to lodge notice of appeal.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

Applicant granted ten (10) days from date of order to file notice of appeal
Costs of application to abide by outcome of intended appeal