republic vs david so ulaya 2005 tzhc 249 26 september 2005
The accused admitted to causing the death of the deceased during a fight, and the facts support a conviction for manslaughter. Mitigating factors justify a reduced sentence.
- Citation
- republic vs david so ulaya 2005 tzhc 249 26 september 2005
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: David s/o Ulaya
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- Convicted on plea of guilty to manslaughter; sentenced to five years imprisonment.
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
David s/o Ulaya
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused is guilty of manslaughter under section 195 of the Penal Code
- 2 Appropriate sentence for manslaughter given mitigating and aggravating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The accused admitted to causing the death of the deceased during a fight, and the facts support a conviction for manslaughter. Mitigating factors justify a reduced sentence.
Court Disposition
Convicted on plea of guilty to manslaughter; sentenced to five years imprisonment.
Orders
- Accused sentenced to five years imprisonment.
- Right of appeal against sentence explained.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment