marchedes kalemela and others vs national executive committee of scout council 2020 tzhc 2032 13 february 2020

marchedes kalemela and others vs national executive committee of scout council 2020 tzhc 2032 13 february 2020

Article 12 does not specifically govern the election of Chief Commissioner; by-laws provide the necessary procedures. The election was conducted lawfully, and appellants failed to prove their assertions.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
marchedes kalemela and others vs national executive committee of scout council 2020 tzhc 2032 13 february 2020
Parties
Appellant: Marchades Kalemela and 27 Others; Respondent: National Executive Committee of the Scout Council
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Election Procedures, Interpretation of Association Constitution, Application of by Laws
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Association Law Election Procedures Interpretation of Association Constitution Application of by Laws

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marchades Kalemela and 27 Others

Appellant

National Executive Committee of the Scout Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Article 12 of the Tanzania Scout Association Constitution governs voting for Chief Commissioner
  2. 2 Whether the election of the Chief Commissioner contravened the Constitution
  3. 3 Whether the Trial Court erred by disregarding appellants' evidence

Ratio Decidendi

Article 12 does not specifically govern the election of Chief Commissioner; by-laws provide the necessary procedures. The election was conducted lawfully, and appellants failed to prove their assertions.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Appellants to pay costs