margaret nnko vs soft tech consultants limited 2023 tzhc 1276 5 may 2023
The application was filed 67 days after excluding the period the previous application was pending in court, which exceeds the statutory 42-day limit; therefore, the application is time barred and must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- margaret nnko vs soft tech consultants limited 2023 tzhc 1276 5 may 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: Margaret Nnko; Respondent: Soft Tech Consultants Limited
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application dismissed as time barred
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Labour Dispute Revision, Jurisdiction, Dismissal for Time Barred Applications
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Margaret Nnko
Applicant
Soft Tech Consultants Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Revision / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the revision application is time barred
- 2 Whether time spent in previous struck out application should be excluded from limitation period
- 3 Appropriate remedy for a time barred application
Ratio Decidendi
The application was filed 67 days after excluding the period the previous application was pending in court, which exceeds the statutory 42-day limit; therefore, the application is time barred and must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed as time barred
Orders
- The preliminary objection is upheld
- The application is dismissed for being filed out of time
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment