margareth mukasa vs akiba commercial bank ltd 4 others 2022 tzhclandd 12671 7 december 2022

margareth mukasa vs akiba commercial bank ltd 4 others 2022 tzhclandd 12671 7 december 2022

Applicant failed to show good cause for extension of time as required by law. The alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record and could not be addressed in the intended application for leave. The sickness ground was not substantiated with specific evidence showing how it contributed to the delay. The applicant failed to account for each day of delay, and the reasons advanced were too casual. Reluctance of advocate and delay in obtaining documents did not justify the delay.

Citation
margareth mukasa vs akiba commercial bank ltd 4 others 2022 tzhclandd 12671 7 december 2022
Parties
Applicant: Margareth Mukasa; 1st Respondent: Akiba Commercial Bank Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Viovena Company Ltd; 3rd Respondent: Gidion William Shirima; 4th Respondent: Star Media (T) Limited; 5th Respondent: Ephania Samson Ruhanyala
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 December 2022
Procedural Posture
Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Delay in Obtaining Judgment and Decree, Sickness as Ground for Delay
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margareth Mukasa

Applicant

Akiba Commercial Bank Ltd

1st Respondent

Viovena Company Ltd

2nd Respondent

Gidion William Shirima

3rd Respondent

Star Media (T) Limited

4th Respondent

Ephania Samson Ruhanyala

5th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to file leave to appeal
  2. 2 Whether delay in obtaining judgment and decree constitutes good cause
  3. 3 Whether sickness constitutes good cause for delay

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to show good cause for extension of time as required by law. The alleged illegality was not apparent on the face of the record and could not be addressed in the intended application for leave. The sickness ground was not substantiated with specific evidence showing how it contributed to the delay. The applicant failed to account for each day of delay, and the reasons advanced were too casual. Reluctance of advocate and delay in obtaining documents did not justify the delay.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed