margesson joseph dalotta vs nbc ltd 2 others 2003 tzhccomd 15 4 september 2003

margesson joseph dalotta vs nbc ltd 2 others 2003 tzhccomd 15 4 september 2003

The plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit against the 1st and 2nd defendants without liberty to re-institute, as no formal defect or sufficient ground was shown. Judgment on admission by the principal debtor does not extinguish the creditor's cause of action against the guarantor; the liability is co-extensive and persists until the debt is fully discharged. The court cannot order execution at the request of a non-decree holder, and there are no grounds to stay proceedings against the guarantor.

Citation
margesson joseph dalotta vs nbc ltd 2 others 2003 tzhccomd 15 4 september 2003
Parties
Plaintiff: Margresson Joseph Dalotta; 1st Defendant: NBC Limited; 2nd Defendant: Comrade Auction Mart Ltd; 3rd Defendant: Mawonu Enterprises Limited
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
4 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Application to Withdraw Suit and Related Prayers
Outcome
Application partly granted and partly dismissed
Legal Topics
Guarantee and Suretyship, Withdrawal of Suit, Counter Claim, Execution of Decree
Source Language
English
Contract Law Banking Law Civil Procedure Guarantee and Suretyship Withdrawal of Suit Counter Claim Execution of Decree

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margresson Joseph Dalotta

Plaintiff

NBC Limited

1st Defendant

Comrade Auction Mart Ltd

2nd Defendant

Mawonu Enterprises Limited

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Ruling on Application to Withdraw Suit and Related Prayers

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff can withdraw the suit against the 1st and 2nd defendants with liberty to re-institute
  2. 2 Whether judgment on admission by the principal debtor extinguishes the creditor's cause of action against the guarantor
  3. 3 Whether the court can order execution of decree at the request of a non-decree holder

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit against the 1st and 2nd defendants without liberty to re-institute, as no formal defect or sufficient ground was shown. Judgment on admission by the principal debtor does not extinguish the creditor's cause of action against the guarantor; the liability is co-extensive and persists until the debt is fully discharged. The court cannot order execution at the request of a non-decree holder, and there are no grounds to stay proceedings against the guarantor.

Court Disposition

Application partly granted and partly dismissed

Orders

  • Plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the suit against the 1st and 2nd defendants without liberty to re-institute.
  • All other prayers, including leave to re-institute, orders regarding execution, and stay of proceedings, are dismissed with costs.