magreth haward lyimo vs eliud jacob bailemba 2021 tzhc 9242 14 december 2021
Failure to administer oaths or affirmations to witnesses is a fatal procedural defect under section 4(a) of the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Act, vitiating the proceedings and requiring nullification and retrial.
- Citation
- magreth haward lyimo vs eliud jacob bailemba 2021 tzhc 9242 14 december 2021
- Parties
- Appellant: Margreth Haward Lyimo; Respondent: Eliud Jacob Bailemba
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Matrimonial Proceedings, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child Custody, Maintenance, Procedural Compliance, Oaths and Affirmations
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Margreth Haward Lyimo
Appellant
Eliud Jacob Bailemba
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court erred by relying on unsworn witness evidence
- 2 Whether failure to administer oaths vitiates proceedings
- 3 Whether overriding objective can cure procedural defects in witness testimony
Ratio Decidendi
Failure to administer oaths or affirmations to witnesses is a fatal procedural defect under section 4(a) of the Oaths and Statutory Declarations Act, vitiating the proceedings and requiring nullification and retrial.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Trial de novo ordered; case remitted to trial court for retrial before another Magistrate with competent jurisdiction.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment