margreth mdaki semzaba and edwin semzaba 2021 tzhc 12531 10 december 2021
- Citation
- margreth mdaki semzaba and edwin semzaba 2021 tzhc 12531 10 december 2021
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 10 December 2021
- Posture
- Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Limited Letters of Administration
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 10 December 2021
- Posture
- Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Limited Letters of Administration
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The application is misconceived and premature as the applicant has not lodged a petition for grant of letters of administration as required by Rule 51(1) of the Probate Rules; thus, she is not entitled to the orders sought.
Court disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application dismissed as misconceived and premature
02
Material facts
Parties
Margreth Mdaki Semzaba
ApplicantEdwin Semzaba
Deceased03
Procedural history
Posture
Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Limited Letters of Administration
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicant is entitled to limited letters of administration for collection and preservation of the estate under section 39 of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act
- 02
Whether the application is properly before the court in absence of a pending petition as required by Rule 51(1) of the Probate Rules
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant seeks limited letters of administration to collect and preserve the estate of the late Edwin Semzaba, arguing her interests are barred by the former administrator who was revoked and that the family has not proposed a new administrator as ordered by the court. She claims interest as the deceased's former wife with a pending share in the estate.
- Respondent
- No respondent submissions recorded; application proceeded ex parte.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 39, Probate and Administration of Estates Act Cap. 352
Court may grant letters of administration limited to collection and preservation of estate property if necessary for preserving the property of a deceased person.
- 02
Rule 51(1), Probate Rules 1963
Application for limited letters of administration under section 39 must be made by a person who has already lodged a petition for a grant in respect of the same estate.
- 03
Section 33(1), Probate and Administration of Estates Act Cap. 352
Where the deceased died intestate, letters of administration may be granted to any person entitled to the estate under the rules of distribution.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The application is misconceived and premature as the applicant has not lodged a petition for grant of letters of administration as required by Rule 51(1) of the Probate Rules; thus, she is not entitled to the orders sought.
Obiter and limits
- Applicant is eligible to petition for grant of letters of administration under section 33(1) of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act, given her interest in the estate and the revocation of the prior administrator.
Court disposition
Application dismissed
- Application dismissed as misconceived and premature
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 10 December 2021
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 10 December 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY)
AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 321 OF 2021 (Arising from Probate and Administration Cause No. 64 of 2016) MARGRETH MDAKI SEMZABA.................... PETITIONER AND EDWIN SEMZABA....... .................................... DECEASED Date of last order: 05/11/2021 Date of Ruling: 10/12/2021
RULING MGONYA, J. The applicant before this Court has approached this honourable court with an application that arises from Probate Cause No. 64 of 2016 seeking for the following orders: 1. That, this Honourable Court be pleased to grant the applicant Letters of Administration limited to the collection and preservation of the estate of the late Edwin Semzaba who died intestate and whose estate is not under any administration and requiring urgent collection and preservation thereof i 2. Costs of this application to come from the estate in issue.
3. Any other relief (s) as this Honourable Court deems fit andjust to grant. The Application before this Court has been made in support of an affidavit sworn by one MAGRETH MDAKI SEMZABA. When the matter was due for hearing the Court ordered that the application be heard by way of written submission. With the Applicant's submissions in place the same is hereby determined. The Applicant in her submission submitted that, this application is preferred by the applicant since her interests are barred by the former Administrator of the estate of the deceased. In Probate and Administration Cause No. 64 of 2016 Laurence Fredrick Semzaba who was appointed administrator of the deceased's estate, the Late Edwin Semzaba. In the above named matter the Applicant herein filed an objection hence became a Caveator. The Court heard the matter and ruled out as it can be traced by the attached judgment of the Court. The Court went further in appointing the administrator with instructions to perform his duties within six months according to the law. The administrator is said to 2 have never attended to his duties as an administrator which led to his revocation and an order to surrender the letters of appointment and other required document. Further there is a ruling of Miscellaneous Application No. 521 of 2020 by Honorable Mlacha, J., that ordered the family of the late Edward Semzaba to propose
another person to petition for letters of administration to replace the one revoked, so as to take over the activities in Probate and Administration Cause No. 64 of 2016. The actions of the revoked administrator as reiterated in the applicant's submission are criminal in nature since the same has not complied to the Court orders of Misc. Application No. 521 of 2020 and is in control of the deceased's estate. However, the applicant herein has interest in the deceased estate since she was the deceased's former wife who had been divorced from him. And that before the execution of the Court's decision on the division of the matrimonial properties the former husband passed away. It is from the interest of the above said properties that she seeks this Court to grant her the prayers in this application. Having gone through the application and submission of the applicant, it is in my awareness that the applicant before this Court has moved the Court under two laws. First is the 3 Probate and Administration of Estates Act Cap. 352 R. E. 2002] together with the Probate Rules of 1963. The Applicant cited section 39 of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act (supra) which states that: "1/7 any case in which it appears necessary for preserving the property of a deceased person, the Court may grant, to any person whom it thinks fit, letters of administration limited to the
collection and preservation of the property of the deceased, and giving discharges for debts due to his estate and to such other acts (other than the distribution of the estate as the Court shall think fit) subject to the directions of the Court." Moreover, the Probate and Administration of Estates Act is read together with the Probate Rules and the same are in supportive of each other. Having moved the Court under section 39 of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act. Rule 51(1) of the Probate Rules was also cited to complete the above-named section. Rule 51(1) states that: "Where an application for letters of administration under section 39 and of the Act is made by a person who has already lodged in the Court a petition for a grant in respect of the same estate, 4 such application shall be made by chamber summons supported by an affidavit in the form prescribed in Form 38 set out in the First Schedule setting out grounds for such application." From the above rule, it is required that a party making an application under section 39 of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act has to have lodged a Petition in Court for a grant in respect of the deceased estate. In the circumstance of this application the applicant has not in any way revealed that she has a petition lodged seeking for grant of letters of administration. The applicant in her submission states to be
seeking for collection and preservation of the deceased for the interest of her share in the estate as a former wife to the deceased. It is for the reason that the prior appointed administrator has been revoked and the family have not appointed anyone to petition as directed in the decision by Hon. Mlacha, J. It is my firm view that the application before this Court is misconceived and premature since the applicant has no pending Petition before the Court as required by Rule 51 (1) of the Probate Rules. However, since the applicant has interest in the deceased estate for her share under the Matrimonial Cause No. 52 of 5 2012 where the two were divorced, she can petition for the letters of administration of the deceased estate so long as the prior administrator has been revoked and the family is reluctant in proposing another person to petition. Section 33 (1) of the Probate Act states: "Where the deceased has died intestate, tetters of administration of his estate may be granted to any person who, according to the rules for the distribution of the state of an intestate applicable in the case of such deceased, would be entitled to the whole or any part of such deceased's estate." Therefore, I find from the submission of the applicant that she is eligible from the content of section 33 (1) of the Probate and Administration of Estates Act to file for grant of letters of administration if she desires to do so. In the event therefore this application before this Court from the reasons set out above is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered. L. E. MGONYA
JUDGE 10/12/2021 6 Court: Ruling delivered in chamber in the presence the Applicant and Mr. Richard RMA. 10/12/2021 7
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.