maria raphael vs huruma joseph 2021 tzhc 2297 26 february 2021
Illegality in the tribunal proceedings regarding assessors' involvement is apparent, of sufficient importance, and mandates extension of time for appeal.
- Citation
- maria raphael vs huruma joseph 2021 tzhc 2297 26 february 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Maria Raphael; 1st Respondent: Huruma Joseph (As the Legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Joseph James Mwalukoba); 2nd Respondent: Moses K. Magamga; 3rd Respondent: HTT Infranco; 4th Respondent: Vodacom
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Illegality in Tribunal Proceedings, Role of Assessors in Land Tribunals
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maria Raphael
Applicant
Huruma Joseph (As the Legal Representative of the Estate of the Late Joseph James Mwalukoba)
1st Respondent
Moses K. Magamga
2nd Respondent
HTT Infranco
3rd Respondent
Vodacom
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient cause exists for extension of time to appeal
- 2 Whether illegality in tribunal proceedings constitutes sufficient cause
Ratio Decidendi
Illegality in the tribunal proceedings regarding assessors' involvement is apparent, of sufficient importance, and mandates extension of time for appeal.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Applicant to lodge appeal within 21 days from date of ruling
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment