millinga 22 safii
The suit is time barred as the cause of action arose in 2011, and the suit was filed in 2024, exceeding the 12-year limitation period for land recovery. The attempt to change the period of the cause of action in the current plaint is a circumvention of admitted facts and is not permissible.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- millinga 22 safii
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mariam Amir Millinga; Plaintiff: Consolata Valentine Maimu; Plaintiff: Alexander Mahemba Mwita; Plaintiff: Berrington Michael Shayo; Defendant: Peter Peter Junior; Defendant: Abdul Mzee Piara (as the administrator of the estate of the late Hamid Abdallah Shine); Defendant: Iddy Mwinyimvua; Defendant: Jamila Ernest Rutajukwa; Defendant: Abdallah Mohamed Zae @ Abdallah Mtekenye; Defendant: Benedict Tesha; Defendant: Joachim Assey; Defendant: Abeid Kibabu; Defendant: Said Omary Said; Defendant: Ustadh Saleh; Defendant: Wafaa Nassoro
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Suit dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Pleadings, Preliminary Objection, Land Ownership, Striking Out Pleadings
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mariam Amir Millinga
Plaintiff
Consolata Valentine Maimu
Plaintiff
Alexander Mahemba Mwita
Plaintiff
Berrington Michael Shayo
Plaintiff
Peter Peter Junior
Defendant
Abdul Mzee Piara (as the administrator of the estate of the late Hamid Abdallah Shine)
Defendant
Iddy Mwinyimvua
Defendant
Jamila Ernest Rutajukwa
Defendant
Abdallah Mohamed Zae @ Abdallah Mtekenye
Defendant
Benedict Tesha
Defendant
Joachim Assey
Defendant
Abeid Kibabu
Defendant
Said Omary Said
Defendant
Ustadh Saleh
Defendant
Wafaa Nassoro
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is time barred under the Law of Limitation Act
- 2 Whether the suit contravenes previous pleadings and ruling in Land Case No. 21 of 2023
Ratio Decidendi
The suit is time barred as the cause of action arose in 2011, and the suit was filed in 2024, exceeding the 12-year limitation period for land recovery. The attempt to change the period of the cause of action in the current plaint is a circumvention of admitted facts and is not permissible.
Court Disposition
Suit dismissed with costs
Orders
- Suit dismissed as time barred under the Law of Limitation Act
- Plaintiffs to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment