mariam christopher vs equity bank tanzania ltd another 2022 tzhclandd 684 26 july 2022

mariam christopher vs equity bank tanzania ltd another 2022 tzhclandd 684 26 july 2022

The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that her alleged mental trauma or financial hardship caused the delay, and did not account for each day of delay as required by law. Therefore, no good cause was shown for extension of time.

Citation
mariam christopher vs equity bank tanzania ltd another 2022 tzhclandd 684 26 july 2022
Parties
Applicant: Mariam Chistopher; 1st Respondent: Equity Bank Tanzania Limited; 2nd Respondent: Christopher Makindi Edward Limited
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Limitation of Actions, Mortgage Enforcement
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Review of Judgment Limitation of Actions Mortgage Enforcement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mariam Chistopher

Applicant

Equity Bank Tanzania Limited

1st Respondent

Christopher Makindi Edward Limited

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file a review against the judgment in Land Case No. 441 of 2017

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that her alleged mental trauma or financial hardship caused the delay, and did not account for each day of delay as required by law. Therefore, no good cause was shown for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed with costs