mark foley vs robert thomson construction equipment another 2005 tzhccomd 43 15 april 2005
The application lacks merit as the prayer is vague, the applicant failed to establish conditions for temporary injunction, and it would not be just and convenient to grant the orders sought. The court's discretionary powers should not be misused.
- Citation
- mark foley vs robert thomson construction equipment another 2005 tzhccomd 43 15 april 2005
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mark Foley; 1st Defendant: Robert Thomson; 2nd Defendant: Construction Equipment Africa Limited
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Receiver, Temporary Injunction, Shareholder Disputes, Security for Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Foley
Plaintiff
Robert Thomson
1st Defendant
Construction Equipment Africa Limited
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to appointment of a Receiver for the 2nd Defendant
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a temporary injunction
- 3 Whether the sale of shares and settlement agreement are illegal, null and void
Ratio Decidendi
The application lacks merit as the prayer is vague, the applicant failed to establish conditions for temporary injunction, and it would not be just and convenient to grant the orders sought. The court's discretionary powers should not be misused.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application for appointment of a Receiver is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment