maro machage maro vs agustino katikiro another 2016 tzhc 2252 14 december 2016

The application was struck out because the applicant failed to properly cite the enabling statute, depriving the court of jurisdiction to consider the matter.

Citation: maro machage maro vs agustino katikiro another 2016 tzhc 2252 14 december 2016
Parties: Applicant: Maro Machage Maro; 1st Respondent: Augustino Katikiro; 2nd Respondent: Kondoa Auction Mart and Court Brokers
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 14 December 2016
Procedural Posture: Civil Revision / Ruling
Outcome: Application struck out with costs.
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Revision, Proper Citation of Statutes
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision Proper Citation of Statutes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

Maro Machage Maro

Applicant

Augustino Katikiro

1st Respondent

Kondoa Auction Mart and Court Brokers

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Revision / Ruling

Legal Issues

1 Whether improper citation of statute renders the application incompetent
2 Whether the applicant is entitled to extension of time and revision of District Court orders

Ratio Decidendi

The application was struck out because the applicant failed to properly cite the enabling statute, depriving the court of jurisdiction to consider the matter.

Court Disposition

Application struck out with costs.

Orders

Application struck out with costs.
Right of appeal explained.