martha masanja vs said omary 2020 tzhclandd 2282 14 september 2020

martha masanja vs said omary 2020 tzhclandd 2282 14 september 2020

The applicant failed to account for the 171-day delay between dismissal of the previous application and filing the current application, which is mandatory for extension of time; therefore, the application lacks merit and is dismissed.

Citation
martha masanja vs said omary 2020 tzhclandd 2282 14 september 2020
Parties
Applicant: Martha Masanja; Respondent: Said Omary
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
14 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Certification on Point of Law, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Delay Justification
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Certification on Point of Law Tribunal Jurisdiction Delay Justification

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martha Masanja

Applicant

Said Omary

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sufficient grounds exist to grant extension of time to apply for certification on point of law
  2. 2 Whether the delay of 171 days was adequately accounted for

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to account for the 171-day delay between dismissal of the previous application and filing the current application, which is mandatory for extension of time; therefore, the application lacks merit and is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Costs awarded to respondent