martin kikombe vs emmanuel kunyumba 2020 tzca 224 13 may 2020

martin kikombe vs emmanuel kunyumba 2020 tzca 224 13 may 2020

The appellant failed to prove that the criminal proceedings terminated in his favour and failed to establish absence of reasonable or probable cause; thus, the essential elements of malicious prosecution were not met and the concurrent findings of the lower courts stand.

Citation
martin kikombe vs emmanuel kunyumba 2020 tzca 224 13 may 2020
Parties
Appellant: Martin Kikombe; Respondent: Emmanuel Kunyumba
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 May 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Malicious Prosecution, Elements of Tort, Appellate Review, Concurrent Findings
Source Language
English
Tort Law Civil Procedure Malicious Prosecution Elements of Tort Appellate Review Concurrent Findings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin Kikombe

Appellant

Emmanuel Kunyumba

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant proved the essential elements of malicious prosecution
  2. 2 Whether the lower courts erred in their findings and application of legal principles

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to prove that the criminal proceedings terminated in his favour and failed to establish absence of reasonable or probable cause; thus, the essential elements of malicious prosecution were not met and the concurrent findings of the lower courts stand.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed in its entirety.
  • The respondent shall have his costs.