martin nicas manya vs maiko musa 4 others 2022 tzhclandd 155 31 march 2022
The application was filed 14 days beyond the prescribed 30-day limitation period, and there was no application for extension of time; therefore, the application is time-barred and must be dismissed under section 3 of the Law of Limitation Act.
- Citation
- martin nicas manya vs maiko musa 4 others 2022 tzhclandd 155 31 march 2022
- Parties
- Applicant: Martin Nicas Manya; 1st Respondent: Maiko Musa; 2nd Respondent: Patrick Brown; 3rd Respondent: Yona Mwanja; 4th Respondent: Victor Matandika; 5th Respondent: Shabani Said
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application dismissed as time-barred
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Setting Aside Dismissal Orders, Proper Citation of Law
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Nicas Manya
Applicant
Maiko Musa
1st Respondent
Patrick Brown
2nd Respondent
Yona Mwanja
3rd Respondent
Victor Matandika
4th Respondent
Shabani Said
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application was filed within the prescribed limitation period
- 2 Whether the application cited the correct legal provisions
Ratio Decidendi
The application was filed 14 days beyond the prescribed 30-day limitation period, and there was no application for extension of time; therefore, the application is time-barred and must be dismissed under section 3 of the Law of Limitation Act.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed as time-barred
Orders
- Each party to shoulder his own costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment