martin pemba vs ngika malewo 2009 tzhc 13 15 may 2009
The appeal was filed more than ninety days after the judgment and is therefore time-barred under the Law of Limitation Act. There is no legal requirement for a notice of appeal in this context. The appeal is dismissed for being out of time.
- Citation
- martin pemba vs ngika malewo 2009 tzhc 13 15 may 2009
- Parties
- Appellant: Martin Pemba; Respondent: Ngika Malewo
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Appeals Procedure, Jurisdiction, Preliminary Objections
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Pemba
Appellant
Ngika Malewo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed limitation period
- 2 Whether a notice of appeal was required before instituting the appeal
- 3 Whether the court had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was filed more than ninety days after the judgment and is therefore time-barred under the Law of Limitation Act. There is no legal requirement for a notice of appeal in this context. The appeal is dismissed for being out of time.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed for being filed out of time.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment