Rita Alex Maro vs Emmanuel Alex Maro Others Civil Application No
No sufficient cause was shown for extension of time as the applicant failed to account for each day of delay and the alleged illegalities required long drawn arguments, thus not apparent on the face of the record.
- Citation
- Rita Alex Maro vs Emmanuel Alex Maro Others Civil Application No
- Parties
- Applicant: Mary Kashura; 1st Respondent: Shose Martin; 2nd Respondent: Zattuni Hamadi; 3rd Respondent: Wilmina Benjamini Lyimo
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Illegality as Sufficient Cause, Jurisdiction, Assessors' Opinion, Stamp Duty, Law of Contract
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Kashura
Applicant
Shose Martin
1st Respondent
Zattuni Hamadi
2nd Respondent
Wilmina Benjamini Lyimo
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sufficient cause was shown for extension of time
- 2 Whether alleged illegalities constitute sufficient cause for extension of time
- 3 Whether applicant accounted for each day of delay
Ratio Decidendi
No sufficient cause was shown for extension of time as the applicant failed to account for each day of delay and the alleged illegalities required long drawn arguments, thus not apparent on the face of the record.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application for extension of time dismissed
- Applicant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment