20111128 TZCA Arusha3
The conviction was quashed because the trial court failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of section 127(2) of the Evidence Act in admitting the evidence of child witnesses, and without their evidence, there was insufficient proof of the offence of rape.
- Citation
- 20111128 TZCA Arusha3
- Parties
- Appellant: Mashaka Dosa; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Child Witness, Competence of Witness, Voir Dire, Standard of Proof
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mashaka Dosa
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court properly admitted the evidence of child witnesses without complying with section 127(2) of the Evidence Act
- 2 Whether the conviction for rape was sustainable in the absence of properly admitted evidence from the victim and corroborating witnesses
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was quashed because the trial court failed to comply with the mandatory requirements of section 127(2) of the Evidence Act in admitting the evidence of child witnesses, and without their evidence, there was insufficient proof of the offence of rape.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence quashed; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- Sentence set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment