20130208 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The application is res judicata because the Court of Appeal, a superior court, dismissed the same application for failure to file written submissions as required by the rules. The High Court cannot entertain the same matter.
- Citation
- 20130208 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Applicant: Masunga Mbegete; Applicant: Haizer M.A. Laizer; Applicant: Ruth Matemba; 1st Respondent: Attorney General; 2nd Respondent: Board of Trustees of the Parastatal Pension Fund
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 8 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Representative Suits, Res Judicata, Sub Judice, Pension Rights, Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Masunga Mbegete
Applicant
Haizer M.A. Laizer
Applicant
Ruth Matemba
Applicant
Attorney General
1st Respondent
Board of Trustees of the Parastatal Pension Fund
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to conduct proceedings as representatives is sub judice or res judicata
- 2 Whether the High Court can entertain the application after dismissal by the Court of Appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The application is res judicata because the Court of Appeal, a superior court, dismissed the same application for failure to file written submissions as required by the rules. The High Court cannot entertain the same matter.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Each party to bear its own costs
- Applicants may pursue their application for review in the Court of Appeal in their individual capacity
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment