mathias abel vs republic 2021 tzca 376 17 august 2021

mathias abel vs republic 2021 tzca 376 17 august 2021

The appeal was not time barred as the appellant presented his petition to the officer in charge of prison within the prescribed period, fulfilling his legal responsibility under section 363 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Any delay in filing was attributable to the prison authorities, not the appellant.

Citation
mathias abel vs republic 2021 tzca 376 17 august 2021
Parties
Appellant: Mathias Abel; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
17 August 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Dismissal for Being Time Barred
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Armed Robbery, Appeal Procedure, Prisoner Rights, Time Bar
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mathias Abel

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From High Court Dismissal for Being Time Barred

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was time barred under section 363 of the Criminal Procedure Act
  2. 2 Whether the appellant discharged his responsibility by presenting the petition to the prison officer
  3. 3 Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the appeal for being filed out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was not time barred as the appellant presented his petition to the officer in charge of prison within the prescribed period, fulfilling his legal responsibility under section 363 of the Criminal Procedure Act. Any delay in filing was attributable to the prison authorities, not the appellant.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • quash the order of dismissal
  • restore the appeal in DC Criminal Appeal No. 55 of 2016