mathias patrick vs republic 2018 tzhc 2250 21 november 2018
The prosecution failed to prove the age of the victims, an essential element for statutory rape, and the evidence was insufficient and contradictory; conviction cannot stand.
- Citation
- mathias patrick vs republic 2018 tzhc 2250 21 november 2018
- Parties
- Appellant: Mathias Patrick; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Unnatural Offence, Grievous Harm, Evidence, Statutory Rape, Credibility of Witnesses
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Mathias Patrick
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence of PW4 was illegally received
- 2 Whether the case against the appellant was proved beyond reasonable doubt
- 3 Whether the trial court satisfied itself on the age of the victim
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution failed to prove the age of the victims, an essential element for statutory rape, and the evidence was insufficient and contradictory; conviction cannot stand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- conviction quashed
- sentence set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment