matoto matoto vs makuru irega 2021 tzhc 7410 26 november 2021

The applicant established a prima facie case of illegality regarding jurisdiction and procedural irregularity, which constitutes sufficient reason to extend time for appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: matoto matoto vs makuru irega 2021 tzhc 7410 26 november 2021
Parties: Applicant: Matoto Matoto; Respondent: Makuru Irega
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 26 November 2021
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome: Application granted
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Jurisdiction, Procedural Irregularities
Source Language: english

Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Illegality as Ground for Extension Jurisdiction Procedural Irregularities

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2

Parties

Matoto Matoto

Applicant

Makuru Irega

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to appeal
2 Whether alleged illegality and procedural irregularities justify extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant established a prima facie case of illegality regarding jurisdiction and procedural irregularity, which constitutes sufficient reason to extend time for appeal.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

Applicant to lodge the appeal within thirty (30) days from the date of the ruling
No order as to costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.