interights and others v mauritania communication 242 of 2001 2004 achpr 56 4 june 2004

interights and others v mauritania communication 242 of 2001 2004 achpr 56 4 june 2004

The African Commission found that while the state may regulate political parties and impose sanctions for breaches of law, the dissolution of UFD/Ere nouvelle was not strictly proportional to the nature of the breaches and offences committed. The measure was excessive and violated Article 10(1) of the African Charter, which protects the right to freedom of association.

Citation
interights and others v mauritania communication 242 of 2001 2004 achpr 56 4 june 2004
Parties
Complainant: INTERIGHTS, Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa, and Association Mauritanienne des Droits de l'Homme; Respondent: Mauritania
Court
ACHPR
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
4 June 2004
Procedural Posture
Communication / Decision on Merits
Outcome
Violation found
Legal Topics
Freedom of Association, Freedom of Expression, Political Parties, Proportionality of Sanctions, Right to Fair Trial
Source Language
English
Human Rights Law Constitutional Law Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Political Parties Proportionality of Sanctions Right to Fair Trial

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

INTERIGHTS, Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa, and Association Mauritanienne des Droits de l'Homme

Complainant

Mauritania

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication / Decision on Merits

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the dissolution of UFD/Ere nouvelle violated the right to freedom of association under Article 10(1) of the African Charter
  2. 2 Whether the dissolution was a proportionate response to the alleged breaches by the political party
  3. 3 Whether the right to a fair trial under Article 7 was violated

Ratio Decidendi

The African Commission found that while the state may regulate political parties and impose sanctions for breaches of law, the dissolution of UFD/Ere nouvelle was not strictly proportional to the nature of the breaches and offences committed. The measure was excessive and violated Article 10(1) of the African Charter, which protects the right to freedom of association.

Court Disposition

Violation found

Orders

  • The African Commission finds that the dissolution of UFD/Ere nouvelle political party by the Respondent State was not proportional to the nature of the breaches and offences committed and is therefore in violation of Article 10(1) of the African Charter.