max gregory vs simon ruda 2015 tzhclandd 16 25 march 2015

max gregory vs simon ruda 2015 tzhclandd 16 25 march 2015

Late supply of the ruling by the DLHT is not a good cause or sufficient ground for extension of time to lodge a second appeal, as the law does not require attachment of the ruling or decree for such an appeal.

Citation
max gregory vs simon ruda 2015 tzhclandd 16 25 march 2015
Parties
Applicant: Max Gregory; Respondent: Simon Ruda
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
25 March 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Land Disputes Courts Act
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Land Disputes Courts Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Max Gregory

Applicant

Simon Ruda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether late supply of the ruling by the DLHT constitutes good cause for extension of time to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Late supply of the ruling by the DLHT is not a good cause or sufficient ground for extension of time to lodge a second appeal, as the law does not require attachment of the ruling or decree for such an appeal.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs
  • Right of Appeal explained