mbawala simon john vs access bank t ltd another 2022 tzhclandd 860 30 august 2022

mbawala simon john vs access bank t ltd another 2022 tzhclandd 860 30 august 2022

The appellant failed to provide proof of requesting and being supplied with the impugned decision within the prescribed period; therefore, the appeal is time-barred and cannot benefit from automatic exclusion of time under Section 19(2) of the Law of Limitation Act.

Citation
mbawala simon john vs access bank t ltd another 2022 tzhclandd 860 30 august 2022
Parties
Appellant: Mbawala Simon John; 1st Respondent: Access Bank (T) Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Aloyce Paul Msechu
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
30 August 2022
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection (time Bar)
Outcome
appeal struck out as time-barred
Legal Topics
Appeals, Limitation Period, Exclusion of Time, Extension of Time
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mbawala Simon John

Appellant

Access Bank (T) Ltd

1st Respondent

Aloyce Paul Msechu

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection (time Bar)

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the prescribed limitation period
  2. 2 Whether the appellant is entitled to automatic exclusion of time spent waiting for copies of the decision

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to provide proof of requesting and being supplied with the impugned decision within the prescribed period; therefore, the appeal is time-barred and cannot benefit from automatic exclusion of time under Section 19(2) of the Law of Limitation Act.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out as time-barred

Orders

  • Appeal struck out with no order as to costs