mechmar corporation malaysia berhard vs vip engineering marketing ltd 2011 tzca 3 16 june 2011

Applicant failed to comply with Rule 106(1) by not filing written submissions within sixty days and did not apply for extension; court vacation days are not generally excluded from computation except if the last day falls on a day when the court is closed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: mechmar corporation malaysia berhard vs vip engineering marketing ltd 2011 tzca 3 16 june 2011
Parties: Applicant: Mechmar Corporation (Malaysia) Berhard; Respondent: VIP Engineering and Marketing Ltd.
Court: TZCA
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 16 June 2011
Procedural Posture: Civil Application for Review / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome: Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics: Computation of Time, Written Submissions, Court Vacation, Preliminary Objection
Source Language: english

Civil Procedure Computation of Time Written Submissions Court Vacation Preliminary Objection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mechmar Corporation (Malaysia) Berhard

Applicant

VIP Engineering and Marketing Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application for Review / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant complied with Rule 106(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 regarding timely filing of written submissions
2 Whether court vacation days are excluded from computation of time for filing written submissions

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

Application dismissed
Costs awarded to respondent

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.