20110720 TZHC Dar es Salaam
A single judge of the Court of Appeal has inherent jurisdiction to make interim orders, including staying execution, to facilitate justice and prevent possible injustice, even without a formal application, provided such orders are temporary and do not prejudice parties. The right to be heard was not violated as the order was interim and affected neither party adversely at that stage. Misrepresentation regarding the status of Civil Case No. 110 of 2010 was an error but did not affect the legality of the order.
- Citation
- 20110720 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Applicant: MEIS Industries Limited; 1st Respondent: Mohamed Enterprises (T) Limited; 2nd Respondent: Tanzania Investment Bank; 3rd Respondent: The Government of the Great Socialist Peoples Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Reference / Ruling on Reference From Order of Single Judge
- Outcome
- Reference dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Inherent Powers of the Court, Stay of Execution, Judicial Discretion, Right to Be Heard, Interim Orders
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MEIS Industries Limited
Applicant
Mohamed Enterprises (T) Limited
1st Respondent
Tanzania Investment Bank
2nd Respondent
The Government of the Great Socialist Peoples Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Reference / Ruling on Reference From Order of Single Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a single judge of the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to grant an interim order staying execution of a High Court decree
- 2 Whether the single judge erred in invoking Rule 4(1) & (2)(b) of the Court Rules, 2009
- 3 Whether the right to be heard was violated by issuing the interim order without hearing the parties
Ratio Decidendi
A single judge of the Court of Appeal has inherent jurisdiction to make interim orders, including staying execution, to facilitate justice and prevent possible injustice, even without a formal application, provided such orders are temporary and do not prejudice parties. The right to be heard was not violated as the order was interim and affected neither party adversely at that stage. Misrepresentation regarding the status of Civil Case No. 110 of 2010 was an error but did not affect the legality of the order.
Court Disposition
Reference dismissed with costs
Orders
- Reference is dismissed
- Applicant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment