20030331 TZHC Bukoba1
The appellant, as the senior wife who cohabited with the deceased and contributed to the acquisition of the estate, is entitled to be appointed administrator. The District Court erred in applying Rule 5 of GN. 436 of 1963 as the respondent was not the elder brother or otherwise qualified under the rule.
- Citation
- 20030331 TZHC Bukoba1
- Parties
- Appellant: Mektrida Aristides; Respondent: Denice Mageli
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Administration, Appointment of Administrator, Distribution of Estate
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mektrida Aristides
Appellant
Denice Mageli
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Who is entitled to be appointed administrator of the estate of the deceased?
- 2 Whether the decision of the District Court reversing the Primary Court was correct in law.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant, as the senior wife who cohabited with the deceased and contributed to the acquisition of the estate, is entitled to be appointed administrator. The District Court erred in applying Rule 5 of GN. 436 of 1963 as the respondent was not the elder brother or otherwise qualified under the rule.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of the Primary Court restored.
- Appellant, Mektrida w/o Aristides, appointed administrator of the estate of the late Aristides Tibabonwa.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment