20150625 TZHC Arusha
The application was filed 35 days after the dismissal order, exceeding the 30-day limitation period, and no reasons for the delay were provided; therefore, the application is time-barred and dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 20150625 TZHC Arusha
- Parties
- Applicant: MELIYO LOGILIEKI; 1st Respondent: LONGIDARE MENAVE; 2nd Respondent: MIDINI LIKIGELYE; 3rd Respondent: MEISAIYA SUMANGA; 4th Respondent: LOSHIRU LESKARI
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Restoration of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Restoration of Appeal, Limitation of Actions
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MELIYO LOGILIEKI
Applicant
LONGIDARE MENAVE
1st Respondent
MIDINI LIKIGELYE
2nd Respondent
MEISAIYA SUMANGA
3rd Respondent
LOSHIRU LESKARI
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Restoration of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for restoration of the dismissed appeal was filed within the prescribed limitation period
- 2 Whether sufficient reasons for delay were furnished
Ratio Decidendi
The application was filed 35 days after the dismissal order, exceeding the 30-day limitation period, and no reasons for the delay were provided; therefore, the application is time-barred and dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment