method christopher vs paulo ruguda 2020 tzhc 4203 14 december 2020
The applicant failed to satisfactorily account for each day of delay, and the explanations provided were found to be unconvincing and unsupported by sufficient evidence.
- Citation
- method christopher vs paulo ruguda 2020 tzhc 4203 14 december 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Method s/o Christopher; Respondent: Paulo s/o Ruduga
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application (extension of Time) / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals, Delay in Filing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Method s/o Christopher
Applicant
Paulo s/o Ruduga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application (extension of Time) / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has sufficiently accounted for the delay in filing the appeal out of time
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to satisfactorily account for each day of delay, and the explanations provided were found to be unconvincing and unsupported by sufficient evidence.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for extension of time is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment