mhuli jibunge vs republic 2010 tzca 48 9 june 2010
The appeal was found incompetent because the notice of appeal did not comply with the mandatory requirements of Rule 61(2) by failing to specify the correct subject of appeal, thus the appeal could not be entertained.
- Citation
- mhuli jibunge vs republic 2010 tzca 48 9 june 2010
- Parties
- Appellant: Mhuli Jibunge; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 9 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Preliminary Objection on Competence of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal struck out as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Armed Robbery, Notice of Appeal, Extension of Time, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mhuli Jibunge
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Preliminary Objection on Competence of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notice of appeal complied with Rule 61(2) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979
- 2 Whether the appeal is competent in light of the defective notice of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was found incompetent because the notice of appeal did not comply with the mandatory requirements of Rule 61(2) by failing to specify the correct subject of appeal, thus the appeal could not be entertained.
Court Disposition
appeal struck out as incompetent
Orders
- The appeal is struck out.
- The appellant may re-institute his appeal in accordance with the law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment